Literature DB >> 22906989

Adaptation of surround inhibition in the human motor system.

P Kassavetis1, T A Saifee, A Sadnicka, I Pareés, M Kojovic, J C Rothwell, M J Edwards.   

Abstract

Adaptation of a rapid ballistic movement requires that commands for the next movement are updated on the basis of sensory error signals from the current movement. Previous experiments, mostly using visual feedback, have demonstrated that adaptation is highly sensitive to the timing of feedback and can be substantially impaired by delays of 100 ms or so. Here, we use the phenomenon of surround inhibition (SI) to explore the consequences of somatosensory feedback delay in a task requiring participants to flex the index finger without generating any electromyographical (EMG) activity in other fingers. Participants were requested to perform brief isolated flexion movements of the index finger. After a short period of practice, SI in the distant abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle was quantified by measuring the amplitude of EMG responses evoked by a standard pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the contralateral motor cortex at the onset of flexion. SI indicates that the response during flexion was smaller than the response at rest. After this, two training blocks were performed in which the ADM muscle was vibrated (80 Hz, 100 ms) either at the onset (VIB(onset)) of finger flexion or with a delay of 100 ms (VIB(100)). SI was reassessed after training. SI measured after VIB(onset) training was transiently more effective than at baseline. In contrast, SI was unchanged compared to baseline after VIB(100). The present study demonstrates that SI can be modified by experience. The timing of the sensory stimulation was found to be critical for the modification of SI, suggesting that only sensory signals closely related to the movement onset can induce adaptive changes, presumably through a feed-forward process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906989     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3207-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?

Authors:  R C Miall; D J Weir; D M Wolpert; J F Stein
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Surround inhibition in human motor system.

Authors:  Young H Sohn; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Covariation in natural causal induction.

Authors:  P W Cheng; L R Novick
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Observations on the reflex response to muscle vibration in man and its voluntary control.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Meadows; H J Hodgson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The use of vibration as a selective repetitive stimulus for Ia afferent fibres.

Authors:  M C Brown; I Enberg; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Short intracortical and surround inhibition are selectively reduced during movement initiation in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Sandra Beck; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Ejaz A Shamim; Nguyet Dang; Martin Schubert; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study.

Authors:  Jui-Cheng Chen; Dorothea Hämmerer; Kevin D'Ostilio; Elias P Casula; Louise Marshall; Chon-Haw Tsai; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Distinct interneuronal networks influence excitability of the surround during movement initiation.

Authors:  Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam; Rohan Khera; Han Wang; Sahana N Kukke; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intracortical Inhibition and Surround Inhibition in the Motor Cortex: A TMS-EEG Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Leodori; Nivethida Thirugnanasambandam; Hannah Conn; Traian Popa; Alfredo Berardelli; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Surround inhibition can instantly be modulated by changing the attentional focus.

Authors:  Yves-Alain Kuhn; Martin Keller; Benedikt Lauber; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.