Literature DB >> 17728389

Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects.

M C Simani1, L M M McGuire, P N Sabes.   

Abstract

Visuomotor coordination requires both the accurate alignment of spatial information from different sensory streams and the ability to convert these sensory signals into accurate motor commands. Both of these processes are highly plastic, as illustrated by the rapid adaptation of goal-directed movements following exposure to shifted visual feedback. Although visual-shift adaptation is a widely used model of sensorimotor learning, the multifaceted adaptive response is typically poorly quantified. We present an approach to quantitatively characterizing both sensory and task-dependent components of adaptation. Sensory aftereffects are quantified with "alignment tests" that provide a localized, two-dimensional measure of sensory recalibration. These sensory effects obey a precise form of "additivity," in which the shift in sensory alignment between vision and the right hand is equal to the vector sum of the shifts between vision and the left hand and between the right and left hands. This additivity holds at the exposure location and at a second generalization location. These results support a component transformation model of sensory coordination, in which eye-hand and hand-hand alignment relies on a sequence of shared sensory transformations. We also ask how these sensory effects compare with the aftereffects measured in target reaching and tracking tasks. We find that the aftereffect depends on both the task performed during feedback-shift exposure and on the testing task. The results suggest the presence of both a general sensory recalibration and task-dependent sensorimotor effect. The task-dependent effect is observed in highly stereotyped reaching movements, but not in the more variable tracking task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17728389      PMCID: PMC2536598          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00290.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  66 in total

1.  Reacquisition deficits in prism adaptation after muscimol microinjection into the ventral premotor cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  K Kurata; E Hoshi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Gaze anchoring to a pointing target is present during the entire pointing movement and is driven by a non-visual signal.

Authors:  S F Neggers; H Bekkering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map.

Authors:  P Vetter; S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The human dorsal premotor cortex generates on-line error corrections during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ji-Hang Lee; Paul van Donkelaar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: organization of the eye-hand coordination loop.

Authors:  G M Redding; B Wallace
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

8.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position.

Authors:  E Bizzi; A Polit; P Morasso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  41 in total

1.  Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The generalization of visuomotor learning to untrained movements and movement sequences based on movement vector and goal location remapping.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nilufer Nourouzpour; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Proprioceptive recalibration following implicit visuomotor adaptation is preserved in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Alina Constantin; Janis Miyasaki; Elena Moro; Robert Chen; Antonio Strafella; Susan Fox; Anthony E Lang; Howard Poizner; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Supervised calibration relies on the multisensory percept.

Authors:  Adam Zaidel; Wei Ji Ma; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.