Literature DB >> 16494690

Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems.

Sen Cheng1, Philip N Sabes.   

Abstract

Recent studies have employed simple linear dynamical systems to model trial-by-trial dynamics in various sensorimotor learning tasks. Here we explore the theoretical and practical considerations that arise when employing the general class of linear dynamical systems (LDS) as a model for sensorimotor learning. In this framework, the state of the system is a set of parameters that define the current sensorimotor transformation-the function that maps sensory inputs to motor outputs. The class of LDS models provides a first-order approximation for any Markovian (state-dependent) learning rule that specifies the changes in the sensorimotor transformation that result from sensory feedback on each movement. We show that modeling the trial-by-trial dynamics of learning provides a substantially enhanced picture of the process of adaptation compared to measurements of the steady state of adaptation derived from more traditional blocked-exposure experiments. Specifically, these models can be used to quantify sensory and performance biases, the extent to which learned changes in the sensorimotor transformation decay over time, and the portion of motor variability due to either learning or performance variability. We show that previous attempts to fit such models with linear regression have not generally yielded consistent parameter estimates. Instead, we present an expectation-maximization algorithm for fitting LDS models to experimental data and describe the difficulties inherent in estimating the parameters associated with feedback-driven learning. Finally, we demonstrate the application of these methods in a simple sensorimotor learning experiment: adaptation to shifted visual feedback during reaching.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16494690      PMCID: PMC2536592          DOI: 10.1162/089976606775774651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  24 in total

1.  System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task.

Authors:  R J Baddeley; H A Ingram; R C Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture.

Authors:  Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements.

Authors:  Z M Pine; J W Krakauer; J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Adaptive plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular responses of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  F A Miles; J H Fuller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Statistical analysis of motor unit firing patterns in a human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  H P Clamann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; S E Cooper; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  59 in total

1.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning on multiple timescales in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation.

Authors:  Mollie K Marko; Adrian M Haith; Michelle D Harran; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural coordination during reach-to-grasp.

Authors:  Mukta Vaidya; Konrad Kording; Maryam Saleh; Kazutaka Takahashi; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Paul Schmitt; John Van Horn; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body.

Authors:  Konrad P Kording; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Obligatory adaptation of saccade gains.

Authors:  Riju Srimal; Jörn Diedrichsen; Edward B Ryklin; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A long-memory model of motor learning in the saccadic system: a regime-switching approach.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.