Literature DB >> 17153391

On two-parameter models of photon cross sections: application to dual-energy CT imaging.

Jeffrey F Williamson1, Sicong Li, Slobodan Devic, Bruce R Whiting, Fritz A Lerma.   

Abstract

The goal of this study is to evaluate the theoretically achievable accuracy in estimating photon cross sections at low energies (20-1000 keV) from idealized dual-energy x-ray computed tomography (CT) images. Cross-section estimation from dual-energy measurements requires a model that can accurately represent photon cross sections of any biological material as a function of energy by specifying only two characteristic parameters of the underlying material, e.g., effective atomic number and density. This paper evaluates the accuracy of two commonly used two-parameter cross-section models for postprocessing idealized measurements derived from dual-energy CT images. The parametric fit model (PFM) accounts for electron-binding effects and photoelectric absorption by power functions in atomic number and energy and scattering by the Klein-Nishina cross section. The basis-vector model (BVM) assumes that attenuation coefficients of any biological substance can be approximated by a linear combination of mass attenuation coefficients of two dissimilar basis substances. Both PFM and BVM were fit to a modern cross-section library for a range of elements and mixtures representative of naturally occurring biological materials (Z = 2-20). The PFM model, in conjunction with the effective atomic number approximation, yields estimated the total linear cross-section estimates with mean absolute and maximum error ranges of 0.6%-2.2% and 1%-6%, respectively. The corresponding error ranges for BVM estimates were 0.02%-0.15% and 0.1%-0.5%. However, for photoelectric absorption frequency, the PFM absolute mean and maximum errors were 10.8%-22.4% and 29%-50%, compared with corresponding BVM errors of 0.4%-11.3% and 0.5%-17.0%, respectively. Both models were found to exhibit similar sensitivities to image-intensity measurement uncertainties. Of the two models, BVM is the most promising approach for realizing dual-energy CT cross-section measurement.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17153391     DOI: 10.1118/1.2349688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  19 in total

1.  A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation.

Authors:  Dong Han; Jeffrey V Siebers; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dimensionality and noise in energy selective x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Robert E Alvarez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prospects for in vivo estimation of photon linear attenuation coefficients using postprocessing dual-energy CT imaging on a commercial scanner: comparison of analytic and polyenergetic statistical reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; Bruce R Whiting; Joseph A O'Sullivan; David G Politte; Paul H Klahr; Yaduo Yu; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Bin Li; Liyuan Chen; Ming Yang; Yifei Lou; Xun Jia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Does kV-MV dual-energy computed tomography have an advantage in determining proton stopping power ratios in patients?

Authors:  M Yang; G Virshup; J Clayton; X R Zhu; R Mohan; L Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Technical Note: Measurement of bow tie profiles in CT scanners using radiochromic film.

Authors:  Bruce R Whiting; Andreea C Dohatcu; Joshua D Evans; David G Politte; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Low-dose photon counting CT reconstruction bias reduction with multi-energy alternating minimization algorithm.

Authors:  Jingwei Lu; Shuangyue Zhang; David G Politte; Joseph A O'Sullivan
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-05-28

9.  Technical Note: On the accuracy of parametric two-parameter photon cross-section models in dual-energy CT applications.

Authors:  Dong Han; Mariela A Porras-Chaverri; Joseph A O'Sullivan; David G Politte; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Experimental implementation of a polyenergetic statistical reconstruction algorithm for a commercial fan-beam CT scanner.

Authors:  Joshua D Evans; Bruce R Whiting; David G Politte; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Paul F Klahr; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.