Literature DB >> 17143110

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer.

Leo Pallwein1, Michael Mitterberger, Johann Gradl, Friedrich Aigner, Wolfgang Horninger, Hannes Strasser, Georg Bartsch, Dieter zur Nedden, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men. Gray-scale ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy is the standard of care for prostate cancer detection in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Systematic biopsy may miss up to 35% of clinically relevant cancers. Color and power Doppler ultrasound, ultrasound contrast agents, and elastography have and will dramatically change the role of ultrasound in prostate cancer diagnosis. RECENT
FINDINGS: Several reports have demonstrated that contrast-enhanced ultrasound investigations of the blood flow of the prostate allow for prostate cancer visualization and therefore, for targeted biopsies. Comparisons between systematic and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-targeted biopsies have shown that the targeted approach detects more cancers with a lower number of biopsy cores. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been shown to detect cancers with higher Gleason scores compared with the systematic approach, which seems to improve prostate cancer grading. In addition, elastography is a new ultrasound technique that allows for the assessment of tissue elasticity.
SUMMARY: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography improve prostate cancer detection and may be useful for prostate cancer grading and staging. Future clinical trials will be needed to determine the promise of these new advances for ultrasound of the prostate evolving into clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17143110     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328011b85c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  20 in total

Review 1.  Robotic prostate biopsy and its relevance to focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Henry Ho; John S P Yuen; Christopher W S Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Real-time elastography for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Jonas Schiffmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Towards ultrasound probe positioning optimization during prostate needle biopsy using pressure feedback.

Authors:  Seyed Reza Mousavi; Kaamran Raahemifar; Stephen Pautler; Abbas Samani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Endorectal multiparametric 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging associated with systematic cognitive biopsies does not increase prostate cancer detection rate: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Giorgio Bozzini; Fabio Grizzi; Mauro Seveso; Alberto Mandressi; Luca Balzarini; Federica Mrakic; Pietro Bono; Oliviero De Franceco; NicolòMaria Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Paolo Casale; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Michael Josef Mitterberger; Friedrich Aigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Hanno Ulmer; Silvio Cavuto; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Tissue elasticity properties as biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth Hoyt; Benjamin Castaneda; Man Zhang; Priya Nigwekar; P Anthony di Sant'agnese; Jean V Joseph; John Strang; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 8.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Ultrasound of the prostate.

Authors:  Michael Mitterberger; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Germar M Pinggera; Ilona Steppan; Peter Rehder; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.