Literature DB >> 24452740

Real-time elastography for the detection of prostate cancer.

Georg Salomon1, Jonas Schiffmann.   

Abstract

The lack of reliable imaging tools in detecting prostate cancer makes a random biopsy still the standard of care to detect prostate cancer. To reduce the number of cores during a biopsy and therefore the risk of biopsy-related complications, an imaging tool which provides reliable guided biopsies is required. Transrectal real-time elastography has shown to have the ability to visualize prostate cancer foci to some extent. In addition to the conventional B-mode image of transrectal ultrasound, it adds information about the stiffness of the prostate tissue. This review highlights the most important studies on elastography to follow the improvements in techniques and to outline the ability to detect prostate cancer and guide biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452740     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-013-0392-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  35 in total

1.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  Katharina König; Ulrich Scheipers; Andreas Pesavento; Andreas Lorenz; Helmut Ermert; Theodor Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Real-time elastography in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with raised PSA level.

Authors:  Atul Kapoor; Aprajita Kapoor; Goldaa Mahajan; Bholla Singh Sidhu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Incremental detection rate of prostate cancer by real-time elastography targeted biopsies in combination with a conventional 10-core biopsy in 1024 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Nils Drews; Philippe Autier; Ann Beckmann; Hans Heinzer; Jens Hansen; Uwe Michl; Thorsten Schlomm; Alex Haese; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Andreas Becker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses.

Authors:  Alexandre E Pelzer; Julia Heinzelbecker; Christel Weiß; Dominik Frühbauer; Anja M Weidner; Matthias Kirchner; Philipp Stroebel; Stephan O Schoenberg; Dietmar J Dinter
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Richard Memo; Carl R Schaub
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.657

6.  Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images.

Authors:  Tomoaki Miyagawa; Masakazu Tsutsumi; Takeshi Matsumura; Natsui Kawazoe; Satoru Ishikawa; Tatsuro Shimokama; Naoto Miyanaga; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Prostate cancer detection with real-time elastography using a bi-plane transducer: comparison with step section radical prostatectomy pathology.

Authors:  Yunkai Zhu; Yaqing Chen; Tingyue Qi; Jun Jiang; Jun Qi; Yongjiang Yu; Xiaohong Yao; Wenbin Guan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Peter Struve; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Georg Bartsch; Johann Gradl; Matthias Schurich; Florian Pedross; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Potentials and limitations of real-time elastography for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step section analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Georg Schäfer; Friedrich Aigner; Peter Schullian; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-31

10.  Impact of Real-Time Elastography versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy Method on Cancer Detection Rate in Men with a Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen between 2.5 and 10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Paola Magnoni; Guido Giusti; Mauro Seveso; Alessio Benetti; Rodolfo Hurle; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Francesco Minuti; Fabio Grizzi; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Sonographic imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  B Schlenker; D A Clevert; G Salomon
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Controversial evidence for the use of HistoScanning™ in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Schiffmann; Lukas Manka; Katharina Boehm; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Markus Graefen; Peter Hammerer; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

Authors:  F Steinkohl; A Luger; J Bektic; F Aigner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Does HistoScanning™ predict positive results in prostate biopsy? A retrospective analysis of 1,188 sextants of the prostate.

Authors:  J Schiffmann; P Tennstedt; J Fischer; Zhe Tian; B Beyer; K Boehm; M Sun; G Gandaglia; U Michl; M Graefen; G Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Correlation between semiquantitative sonoelastography and immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of testicular focal lesions.

Authors:  Antonio Luigi Pastore; Giovanni Palleschi; Piero Maceroni; Giorgia Manfredonia; Domenico Autieri; Jessica Cacciotti; Barbara Sardella; Natale Porta; Vincenzo Petrozza; Antonio Carbone
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.