Literature DB >> 21931344

Robotic prostate biopsy and its relevance to focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Henry Ho1, John S P Yuen, Christopher W S Cheng.   

Abstract

Focal therapy is an individualized treatment option for prostate cancer, which destroys localized cancerous tissue but not normal tissue, thus avoiding the morbidities associated with whole-gland therapy. Accurate cancer localization and precise ablation are integral to the success of focal therapy, which remains unproven owing to suboptimal patient selection. Currently, there are no clinical or biopsy features that can identify unifocal prostate cancer and no imaging modality that can accurately diagnose or localize prostate cancer. MRI diagnosis has the best accuracy but high cost and limited access hinder its widespread adoption. New management options, including focal therapy and active surveillance, require prostate biopsy to detect, localize and characterize the cancer. Transrectal prostate biopsy has a high false-negative detection rate, which might be related to an inability to biopsy the anterior and apical part of the prostate or interoperator variation. Transrectal biopsy is also associated with sepsis and bleeding. Robotic transperineal prostate biopsy can overcome the limitations of transrectal procedures. Robotic biopsy is automated with high accuracy, has improved access to the apex and anterior part of the prostate and has low risk of sepsis. Furthermore, it involves only two skin punctures, compared with template-based transperineal prostate biopsy, which can result in multiple wounds. Robotic prostate biopsy fulfills the fundamental needs of focal therapy and might be the platform for future treatment delivery for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931344     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  54 in total

1.  Robotic transperineal prostate biopsy: pilot clinical study.

Authors:  H Ho; J S P Yuen; P Mohan; E W Lim; C W S Cheng
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prostatic cryosurgery: use of MR imaging in evaluation of success and technical modifications.

Authors:  A D Vellet; J Saliken; B Donnelly; E Raber; R F McLaughlin; D Wiseman; N H Ali-Ridha
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Benchmarks for success in focal therapy of prostate cancer: cure or control?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study.

Authors:  B Djavan; M Waldert; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; C Seitz; M Remzi; A Borkowski; C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Neil Glossop; Peter Guion; Karen Ullman; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  MRI techniques for prediction of local tumor progression after high-intensity focused ultrasonic ablation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Hyun Moo Lee; Sam Soo Kim; EunJu Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Appropriate candidates for hemiablative focal therapy are infrequently encountered among men selected for radical prostatectomy in contemporary cohort.

Authors:  Basir Tareen; Alex Sankin; Guilherme Godoy; Steve Temkin; Herbert Lepor; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: supportive data for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oren Cahlon; Margie Hunt; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fast and robust extraction of surrogate respiratory signal from intra-operative liver ultrasound images.

Authors:  Jiaze Wu; Cheng Li; Su Huang; Feng Liu; Bien Soo Tan; London Lucien Ooi; Haoyong Yu; Jimin Liu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Ran Chen; Weiliang Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.