Literature DB >> 19901915

Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Nicolas B Delongchamps1, Gabriel P Haas.   

Abstract

Since its introduction, ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy has undergone significant evolution. Because of the low sensitivity of ultrasonography in detecting prostate cancer, tissue is sampled randomly within the gland. In an attempt to enhance cancer detection and characterization, the trend has been to increase the number of biopsy cores taken. Saturation biopsies of the prostate gland were first evaluated as a diagnostic tool. When performed as an initial procedure, saturation biopsies do not seem to improve cancer detection when compared to standard biopsy. However, saturation biopsies might be of clinical value in patients with previous negative standard biopsies but persistently rising PSA levels. As a staging tool, the use of saturation biopsies was proposed mainly to avoid overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Results from clinical and autopsy studies have suggested that saturation biopsies are more accurate than standard biopsies in histological characterization of prostate cancer. Improving cancer characterization might require an increase in the number of cores taken, but knowing their precise location is paramount. Strict template guidance and three-dimensional techniques offer a more comprehensive approach than current ultrasound-guided approaches, and the advantage of precisely recording every core location. New imaging techniques, such as diffusion-weighted and spectroscopic MRI might also help in targeting prostate biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19901915     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  57 in total

1.  2005 update on pathology of prostate biopsies with cancer.

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Remigio Vela-Navarrete; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Aldo Bono
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Prostate saturation biopsy in the reevaluation of microfocal prostate cancer.

Authors:  L M Boccon-Gibod; N Barry de Longchamps; M Toublanc; L A Boccon-Gibod; V Ravery
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy.

Authors:  J Stephen Jones; Amit Patel; Lynn Schoenfield; John C Rabets; Craig D Zippe; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.

Authors:  L M Boccon-Gibod; O Dumonceau; M Toublanc; V Ravery; L A Boccon-Gibod
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Contemporary impact of transrectal ultrasound lesions for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Rahmi Onur; Peter J Littrup; J Edson Pontes; Fernando J Bianco
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence.

Authors:  Gabriel P Haas; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Richard F Jones; Vishal Chandan; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Mary Jumbelic; Gregory Threatte; Rus Korets; Hans Lilja; Gustavo de la Roza
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of extended biopsies for the staging of microfocal prostate cancers in autopsy specimen.

Authors:  N B Delongchamps; G de la Roza; V Chandan; R Jones; G Threatte; M Jumbelic; G P Haas
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Parasagittal biopsies add minimal information in repeat saturation prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; J Stephen Jones; John Rabets; Gerard DeOreo; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Evolution of the presentation and pathologic and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed during the PSA era.

Authors:  Jean O Ung; Jerome P Richie; Ming-Hui Chen; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Winston Barzell
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Efficacy of Target Biopsy of Suspected Cancer Lesions Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and/or Transrectal Ultrasonography during Initial Prostate Biopsies: Comparison of Outcomes between Two Physicians.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Seiya Inoue; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Akihisa Yao; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  MRI-directed cognitive fusion-guided biopsy of the anterior prostate tumors.

Authors:  Ian G Murphy; Elaine NiMhurchu; Robert G Gibney; Colm J McMahon
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Correas; Ethan J Halpern; Richard G Barr; Sangeet Ghai; Jochen Walz; Sylvain Bodard; Charles Dariane; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Is it possible to model the risk of malignancy of focal abnormalities found at prostate multiparametric MRI?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Matthieu Papillard; Nicolas Girouin; Romain Boutier; Muriel Rabilloud; Benjamin Riche; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Albert Gelet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Defining the threshold for significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theo H Van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  A biomedical engineering approach to mitigate the errors of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Gordon Kepner; Jeremy Kepner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Targeted biopsy based on ADC map in the detection and localization of prostate cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Masako Nagayama; Tohru Araki; Akito Terai; Akira Okumura; Yoshiki Amoh; Takayoshi Ishimori; Satoru Nakashita; Yoshihiro Dodo
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Detection and localization of prostate cancer with the targeted biopsy strategy based on ADC map: a prospective large-scale cohort study.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Akito Terai; Tohru Araki; Masako Nagayama; Akira Okumura; Yoshiki Amoh; Takayoshi Ishimori; Mana Ishibashi; Satoru Nakashita; Yoshihiro Dodo
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Markers of field cancerization: proposed clinical applications in prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Kristina A Trujillo; Anna C Jones; Jeffrey K Griffith; Marco Bisoffi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2012-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.