Literature DB >> 23645369

Towards ultrasound probe positioning optimization during prostate needle biopsy using pressure feedback.

Seyed Reza Mousavi1, Kaamran Raahemifar, Stephen Pautler, Abbas Samani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate needle biopsy requires registering preoperative 3D TRUS or MR image, in which tumors and other suspicious areas are visible, to intraoperative 2D TRUS images. Such image registration is time-consuming while its real-time implementation is yet to be developed. To bypass this registration step, robotic needle biopsy systems can be used to place the US probe at the same position relative to the prostate during the 3D and 2D image acquisition to ensure similar prostate deformation. To have such similar deformation, only visual feedback is not sufficient as such feedback can be used to only guarantee that the whole prostate is within the field of view irrespective of the probe's orientation. As such, contact pressure feedback can be utilized to ensure consistent minimum contact between the probe and prostate.
METHOD: A robotic system is proposed where a TRUS probe with pressure sensor array is used. The contact pressure can be measured during imaging and used to provide feedback in conjunction with an optimization algorithm for consistent probe positioning. The robotic system is driven by the feedback to position the probe such that pressure pattern of the sensors during 2D image acquisition is similar to the pressure pattern during 3D image acquisition. The proposed method takes into account the patient's body movement expected during image acquisition. In this study, an in silico phantom is used where the simulated contact pressure distribution required in the optimization algorithm is obtained using a prostate finite element model. RESULT: Starting from an arbitrary position where the probe contacts the phantom, this position was varied systematically until a position corresponding to maximum pressure pattern similarity between contact pressure patterns corresponding to the 2D and 3D imaging was achieved successfully.
CONCLUSION: Results obtained from the in silico phantom study indicate that the proposed technique is capable of ensuring having only minimal relative prostate deformation between preoperative image acquisition and intraoperative imaging used for guiding needle biopsy, paving the way for faster and more accurate registration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23645369     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0898-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  13 in total

1.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Robot-assisted 3D-TRUS guided prostate brachytherapy: system integration and validation.

Authors:  Zhouping Wei; Gang Wan; Lori Gardi; Gregory Mills; Donal Downey; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The contribution of strain patterns in characterization of prostate peripheral zone lesions at transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jie Tang; Yan-mi Li; Xiang Fei; En-hui He; Qiu-yang Li; Huai-yin Shi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion.

Authors:  Boris A Hadaschik; Timur H Kuru; Corina Tulea; Philip Rieker; Ionel V Popeneciu; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Johannes Huber; Pawel Zogal; Dogu Teber; Sascha Pahernik; Matthias Roethke; Patrik Zamecnik; Wilfried Roth; Georgios Sakas; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A Study of Needle Image Artifact Localization in Confirmation Imaging of MRI-guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Song; Nathan B Cho; Iulian I Iordachita; Peter Guion; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom       Date:  2011-08-15

Review 6.  Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Johann Gradl; Friedrich Aigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Hannes Strasser; Georg Bartsch; Dieter zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 7.  Prostate cancer: assessment of risk using digital rectal examination, tumor grade, prostate-specific antigen, and systematic biopsy.

Authors:  J C Presti
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results.

Authors:  Christophe Reynier; Jocelyne Troccaz; Philippe Fourneret; André Dusserre; Cécile Gay-Jeune; Jean-Luc Descotes; Michel Bolla; Jean-Yves Giraud
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Jens Köllerman; Imke Thederan; Felix K H Chun; Lars Budäus; Thorsten Schlomm; Hendrik Isbarn; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Leonard Marks; Shelena Young; Shyam Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.