Literature DB >> 20571801

Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Michael Josef Mitterberger1, Friedrich Aigner, Wolfgang Horninger, Hanno Ulmer, Silvio Cavuto, Ethan J Halpern, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound (CECD-US) targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy (SB) for PCa detection in 1,776 men.
METHODS: Retrospective, single-centre, diagnostic accuracy study from 2002 until 2006 in 1,776 male volunteers with a serum total PSA of 1.25 ng/ml or greater. In each patient five CECD-US targeted biopsies were performed in hypervascular areas in the peripheral zone during intravenous injection of a second-generation microbubble US contrast agent. Subsequently, another examiner performed ten SBs. The PCa detection rates for the two techniques were compared.
RESULTS: Of 1,776 patients, cancer was detected in 559 patients (31%), including 476 of the 1,776 patients (27%) with CECD-US and 410 (23%) with SB (p < 0.001). The detection rate for CECD-US targeted biopsy cores (10.8% or 961 of 8,880 cores) was significantly better than for SB cores (5.1% or 910 of 17,760 cores, p < 0.001). Among patients with a positive biopsy for PCa, cancer was detected by CECD-US alone in 149 patients (27%) and by SB alone in 83 (15%) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest clinical trial to date, demonstrating a significant benefit of CECD-US targeted biopsy relative to SB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20571801     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1860-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Saturation biopsy of the prostate: why saturation does not saturate.

Authors:  Gianluca Giannarini; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe di Lorenzo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and prostate cancer; a multicentre European research coordination project.

Authors:  Margot Wink; Ferdinand Frauscher; David Cosgrove; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Leo Palwein; Michael Mitterberger; Chris Harvey; Olivier Rouvière; Jean de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Does the yield of prostate cancer biopsy and repeat biopsy justify the frequency of their use?

Authors:  Joseph Presti
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2008-03-25

4.  Ultrasonically guided precise needle placement in the prostate and the seminal vesicles.

Authors:  H H Holm; J Gammelgaard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Richard A Ashley; Brant A Inman; Jonathan C Routh; Lance A Mynderse; Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Prostate biopsy strategies.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2007-09

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer and kidney lesions.

Authors:  Michael Mitterberger; Alexandre Pelzer; Daniela Colleselli; Georg Bartsch; Hannes Strasser; Leo Pallwein; Friedrich Aigner; Johann Gradl; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Damber; Gunnar Aus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using cadence-contrast pulse sequencing technology for targeted biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Germar M Pinggera; Gregor Mikuz; Wolfgang Horninger; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound flash replenishment method for directed prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Robert A Linden; Edouard J Trabulsi; Flemming Forsberg; Paul R Gittens; Leonard G Gomella; Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Usefulness of perflubutane microbubble-enhanced ultrasound in imaging and detection of prostate cancer: phase II multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Hiroji Uemura; Futoshi Sano; Akira Nomiya; Toshihiro Yamamoto; Masafumi Nakamura; Yasuhide Miyoshi; Kenta Miki; Kazumi Noguchi; Shin Egawa; Yukio Homma; Yoshinobu Kubota
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Ran Chen; Weiliang Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  [Imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  J Walz; T Loch; G Salomon; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies.

Authors:  Antoine van Hove; Pierre-Henri Savoie; Charlotte Maurin; Serge Brunelle; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Naji Salem; Jochen Walz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  HistoScanningTM to Detect and Characterize Prostate Cancer-a Review of Existing Literature.

Authors:  James S Wysock; Alex Xu; Clement Orczyk; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern; Leonard G Gomella; Flemming Forsberg; Peter A McCue; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karl Pummer; Malte Rieken; Herbert Augustin; Thomas Gutschi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Hayet Amalou; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Pingkun Yan; Jochen Kruecker; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C J Harvey; J Pilcher; J Richenberg; U Patel; F Frauscher
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.