Literature DB >> 19145270

Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Claus G Roehrborn.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound-guided systemic biopsy is the recommended method in most cases with suspicion of prostate cancer. Transrectal periprostatic injection with a local anesthetic may be offered as effective analgesia; periprostatic nerve block with 1% or 2% lidocaine is the recommended form of pain control. On initial biopsy, a minimum of 10 systemic, laterally directed cores is recommended, with more cores in larger glands. Extended prostate biopsy schemes, which require cores weighted more laterally at the base (lateral horn) and medially to the apex, show better cancer detection rates without increasing adverse events. Transition zone biopsies are not recommended in the first set of biopsies, owing to low detection rates. One set of repeat biopsies is warranted in cases with persistent indication. Saturation biopsy (>/=20 cores) should be reserved for repeat biopsy in patients who have negative results on initial biopsy but who are still strongly suspected to have prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Biopsy; Nomograms; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Transrectal ultrasound

Year:  2008        PMID: 19145270      PMCID: PMC2615104     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  153 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  H Y Tiong; L C H Liew; M Samuel; D Consigliere; K Esuvaranathan
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Development and external validation of an extended 10-core biopsy nomogram.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Christopher Porter; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea Gallina; Jochen Walz; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Andreas Erbersdobler; Thorsten Schlomm; Sascha A Ahyai; Eike Currlin; Luc Valiquette; Hans Heinzer; Patrizio Rigatti; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Development and external validation of an extended repeat biopsy nomogram.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Christopher Porter; Francesco Montorsi; Alexander Haese; Vincenzo Scattoni; Lester Borden; Thomas Steuber; Andrea Salonia; Thorsten Schlomm; Kalyan Latchemsetty; Jochen Walz; Jason Kim; Christian Eichelberg; Eike Currlin; Sascha A Ahyai; Andreas Erbersdobler; Luc Valiquette; Hans Heinzer; Patrizio Rigatti; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Saturation biopsy for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Stephen Jones
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Johann Gradl; Friedrich Aigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Hannes Strasser; Georg Bartsch; Dieter zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  Secondary prostatic adenocarcinoma: a cytopathological study of 50 cases.

Authors:  Kien T Mai; Nicolas L D Roustan Delatour; Ali Assiri; Hatim Al-Maghrabi
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.582

7.  Extensive transperineal template biopsies of prostate: modified technique and results.

Authors:  Simon R J Bott; Alastair Henderson; James E Halls; Bruce S I Montgomery; Robert Laing; Stephen E M Langley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Combined "periprostatic and periapical" local anesthesia is not superior to "periprostatic" anesthesia alone in reducing pain during Tru-Cut prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Cevik; Ozdal Dillioglugil; Amnon Zisman; Atif Akdas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; M J Roobol; M W Kattan; T H van der Kwast; H J de Koning; F H Schröder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakami; Tetsuo Okuno; Junji Yonese; Toru Igari; Gaku Arai; Yasuhisa Fujii; Yukio Kageyama; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  43 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of MRI-based PSA density in predicting transperineal sector-guided prostate biopsy outcomes.

Authors:  Findlay MacAskill; Su-Min Lee; David Eldred-Evans; Wahyu Wulaningsih; Rick Popert; Konrad Wolfe; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Giles Rottenberg; Sidath H Liyanage; Peter Acher
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Phantom Studies of Fused-Data TREIT Using Only Biopsy-Probe Electrodes.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Xiaotian Wu; Alicia C Everitt; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?

Authors:  Vincenzo Scattoni; Carmen Maccagnano; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?

Authors:  Saiful Miah; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Wei-Chan Lin; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Nazanin H Asvadi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Daniel J A Margolis; David S K Lu; Holden Wu; Kyung Hyun Sung; David Y Lu; Jaioti Huang; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies.

Authors:  Bjoern Grabski; Leif Baeurle; Annemie Loch; Bjoern Wefer; Udo Paul; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Interactions between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer in large prostates: a retrospective data review.

Authors:  Shadi Al-Khalil; David Boothe; Trey Durdin; Sowmya Sunkara; Phillip Watkins; Shengping Yang; Allan Haynes; Werner de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Prostate focused ultrasound focal therapy--imaging for the future.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Albert Gelet; Sébastien Crouzet; Jean-Yves Chapelon
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jiří Stejskal; Vanda Adamcová; Miroslav Záleský; Vojtěch Novák; Otakar Čapoun; Vojtěch Fiala; Olga Dolejšová; Hana Sedláčková; Štěpán Veselý; Roman Zachoval
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.