Literature DB >> 17119942

Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace.

Daniel G Woolley1, James R Tresilian, Richard G Carson, Stephan Riek.   

Abstract

Studies examining dual adaptation to opposing novel environments have yielded contradictory results, with previous evidence supporting both successful dual adaptation and interference leading to poorer adaptive performance. Whether or not interference is observed during dual adaptation appears to be dependent on the method used to allow the performer of the task to distinguish between two novel environments. This experiment tested if colour cues, a separation in workspace, and presentation schedule, could be used to distinguish between two opposing visuomotor rotations and enable dual adaptation. Through the use of a purpose designed manipulandum, each visuomotor rotation was either presented in the same region of workspace and associated with colour cues (Group 1), different regions of workspace in addition to colour cues (Groups 2 and 3) or different regions of workspace only (Groups 4 and 5). We also assessed the effectiveness of the workspace separation with both randomised and alternating presentation schedules (Groups 4 and 5). The results indicated that colour cues were not effective at enabling dual adaptation when each of the visuomotor rotations was associated with the same region of workspace. When associated with different regions of workspace, however, dual adaptation to the opposing rotations was successful regardless of whether colour cues were present or the type of presentation schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119942     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0778-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  17 in total

1.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment?

Authors:  A Karniel; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory.

Authors:  Virginia Wigmore; Christine Tong; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series.

Authors:  N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury; D E Young; L Proteau
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps.

Authors:  H A Cunningham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Charles Worringham; Monika Thomas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Interference between velocity-dependent and position-dependent force-fields indicates that tasks depending on different kinematic parameters compete for motor working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  24 in total

1.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The efficacy of colour cues in facilitating adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Daniel G Woolley; James R Tresilian; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Concurrent adaptation to opposite visual distortions: impairment and cue.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-10

4.  A dissociation between visual and motor workspace inhibits generalization of visuomotor adaptation across the limbs.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback depends on the number and spread of target directions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual target separation determines the extent of generalisation between opposing visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Daniel G Woolley; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson; Stephan Riek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visuomotor adaptation and generalization with repeated and varied training.

Authors:  Jason L Neva; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Separation of visual and motor workspaces during targeted reaching results in limited generalization of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Michelle J Johnson; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations by varying hand and body postures.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Relative errors can cue absolute visuomotor mappings.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.