Literature DB >> 2527958

Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps.

H A Cunningham1.   

Abstract

Transformed spatial mappings were used to perturb normal visual-motor processes and reveal the structure of internal spatial representations used by the motor control system. In a 2-D discrete aiming task performed under rotated visual-motor mappings, the pattern of spatial movement error was the same for all Ss: peak error between 90 degrees and 135 degrees of rotation and low error for 180 degrees rotation. A two-component spatial representation, based on oriented bidirectional movement axes plus direction of travel along such axes, is hypothesized. Observed reversals of movement direction under rotations greater than 90 degrees are consistent with the hypothesized structure. Aiming error under reflections, unlike rotations, depended on direction of movement relative to the axis of reflection (see Cunningham & Pavel, in press). Reaction time and movement time effects were observed, but a speed-accuracy tradeoff was found only for rotations for which the direction-reversal strategy could be used. Finally, adaptation to rotation operates at all target locations equally but does not alter the relative difficulty of different rotations. Structural properties of the representation are invariant under learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2527958     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  67 in total

1.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Acquisition and generalization of visuomotor transformations by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Chen Nathan; Thomas Boraud; Hagai Bergman; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Human adaptation to rotated vision: interplay of a continuous and a discrete process.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Sylvie Abeele; Udo Eversheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Tyler Cluff; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.