Literature DB >> 11999865

Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory.

Virginia Wigmore1, Christine Tong, J Randall Flanagan.   

Abstract

When participants adapt to equal and opposite visuomotor rotations in close temporal proximity, memory of the 1st is not consolidated. The authors investigated whether this retrograde interference depends on the use of equal and opposite rotations. On Day 1, different groups of participants adapted to a -30 degrees rotation followed 5 min later by rotations of +30 degrees, +60 degrees, or -60 degrees. On Day 2, all groups were retested on the -30 degrees rotation. Either retrograde interference (in groups who adapted to rotations of opposite sign on Day 1) or retrograde facilitation (in the remaining group) was observed. In all groups, learning of the 2nd rotation resulted in unlearning of the first, indicating that all visuomotor rotations compete for common working memory resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999865     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  63 in total

1.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference.

Authors:  R Christopher Miall; Ned Jenkinson; Kunal Kulkarni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Charles Worringham; Monika Thomas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Learning and transfer of bimanual multifrequency patterns: effector-independent and effector-specific levels of movement representation.

Authors:  Sophie Vangheluwe; Ellen Suy; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Human adaptation to rotated vision: interplay of a continuous and a discrete process.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Sylvie Abeele; Udo Eversheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.