Literature DB >> 21279631

Adaptation to rotated visual feedback depends on the number and spread of target directions.

Otmar Bock1, Gerd Schmitz.   

Abstract

It has been proposed in the past that adaptation to rotated visual feedback is based on directionally tuned modules. Here, we investigate whether adaptation depends on the number of modules that are concurrently activated. To disambiguate the number of modules and their spatial overlap, we decided to vary the number of target directions and their spacing independently. In light of recent work on the existence of fast and slow adaptive processes, we analyzed the role of target number and spacing separately for the first eight movements under rotated visual feedback and for later movements. We found that during the first eight movements, adaptation progressed three times faster when targets were spaced across a 42° rather than across a 360° range, irrespective of their number. During the subsequent movements, adaptation progressed 1.66 times faster with two than with eight targets, irrespective of their spacing. This differential dependence of early and late adaptation on target metrics confirms the existence of adaptive processes with different time scales and suggests that those processes differ not only by their clocking speed, but also by their functional properties. Specifically, the speed of fast processes seems to be constrained by the directional tuning width of adaptive modules, and the speed of slow processes by the number of presentations per target direction.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279631     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2564-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  A PET study of visuomotor learning under optical rotation.

Authors:  K Inoue; R Kawashima; K Satoh; S Kinomura; M Sugiura; R Goto; M Ito; H Fukuda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Mechanisms for sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input.

Authors:  S Abeele; O Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Snoddy (1926) revisited: time scales of motor learning.

Authors:  Shannon M Stratton; Yeou-Teh Liu; Siang Lee Hong; Gottfried Mayer-Kress; Karl M Newell
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation through interaction between posterior parietal and motor cortical areas.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; R E Kettner; A B Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two-dimensional arm movements: relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory.

Authors:  Jeong-Yoon Lee; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace.

Authors:  Daniel G Woolley; James R Tresilian; Richard G Carson; Stephan Riek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  9 in total

1.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interference between adaptation to double steps and adaptation to rotated feedback in spite of differences in directional selectivity.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Impaired visuomotor generalization by inconsistent attentional contexts.

Authors:  Tony S L Wang; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Correlations between executive functions and adaptation to incrementally increasing sensorimotor discordances.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz; Mirco Dierking; Anthea Guenther
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visuomotor adaptation and generalization with repeated and varied training.

Authors:  Jason L Neva; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Neural correlates of adaptation to gradual and to sudden visuomotor distortions in humans.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Christoph F Schorn; Otmar Bock; Nina Theysohn; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Influence of movement kinematics on visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Anja Simon; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A comparison of sensorimotor adaptation in the visual and in the auditory modality.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz; Otmar Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Basic principles of sensorimotor adaptation to different distortions with different effectors and movement types: a review and synthesis of behavioral findings.

Authors:  Otmar Bock
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.