Literature DB >> 26289481

Concurrent adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations by varying hand and body postures.

Maria N Ayala1,2, Bernard Marius 't Hart3, Denise Y P Henriques4,3,5.   

Abstract

When reaching towards objects, the human central nervous system (CNS) can actively compensate for two different perturbations simultaneously (dual adaptation), though this does not simply occur upon presentation. Dual adaptation is made more difficult when the desired trajectories and targets are identical and hence do not cue the impending perturbation. In cases like these, the CNS requires contextual cues in order to predict the dynamics of the environment. Not all cues are effective at facilitating dual adaptation. In two experiments, we investigated the efficacy of two contextual cues that are intrinsic to the CNS, namely hand as well as body posture in concurrently adapting to two opposing visuomotor rotations. For the hand posture experiment, we also look at the role of extended training. Participants reached manually to visual targets with their unseen hand represented by a cursor that was rotated either 30° clockwise or counterclockwise, determined randomly on each reach. Each rotation was associated with a distinct hand posture (a precision or power grip, respectively) in one experiment and a distinct body rotation (10° leftward or rightward turn of the seat, respectively, while fixating straight) in the second experiment. Critically, the targets (and thus, the required cursor trajectories) were identical in both rotations. We found that how people held the tool or oriented their body while reaching is sufficient for concurrently adapting separate visuomotor mappings such that over time, reach errors significantly decrease. Extended practice did not lead to further benefits though. These findings suggest that when the required cursor movements are identical for different visuomotor mappings, dual adaptation is still possible given sufficient intrinsic contextual cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellum; Dual adaptation; Internal model; Motor learning; Reaching; Visuomotor rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26289481     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4411-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Distinct motor plans form and retrieve distinct motor memories for physically identical movements.

Authors:  Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Implicit and explicit components of dual adaptation to visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Mathias Hegele; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-12

5.  Lack of adaptation to random conflicting force fields of variable magnitude.

Authors:  Rahul Gupta; James Ashe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Concurrent adaptation to opposite visual distortions: impairment and cue.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-10

7.  Visual target separation determines the extent of generalisation between opposing visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Daniel G Woolley; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson; Stephan Riek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visual displacements during an alternating movement.

Authors:  J M Galea; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Dual adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations with similar hand movement trajectories.

Authors:  Ravindra Baldeo; Denise Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impaired visuomotor generalization by inconsistent attentional contexts.

Authors:  Tony S L Wang; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Context-dependent concurrent adaptation to static and moving targets.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Neglect-Like Effects on Drawing Symmetry Induced by Adaptation to a Laterally Asymmetric Visuomotor Delay.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Guy Avraham; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Plan-based generalization shapes local implicit adaptation to opposing visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Jordan A Taylor; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  How different effectors and action effects modulate the formation of separate motor memories.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Lisa Langsdorf; Jordan A Taylor; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Differential contributions of implicit and explicit learning mechanisms to various contextual cues in dual adaptation.

Authors:  Maria N Ayala; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.