Literature DB >> 15754178

Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions.

Otmar Bock1, Charles Worringham, Monika Thomas.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that subjects can adapt with either arm to an opposite visual distortion, and the two adaptive states can then be used in sequence to control the respective arm. To extend this finding, we exposed the left and right arms of our subjects to opposite-directed rotations of the visual field alternately for 20 s each, and determined the time-course of adaptation, as well as aftereffects without visual feedback under uni- and bimanual conditions. Our data confirm that two adaptive states can co-exist in the sensorimotor system, one for each arm. We further found that the time-course of adaptive improvement was similar for both arms, that the improvement was present as early as the first movement after a change of arm and discordance, and that the magnitude of adaptation was similar to control data yielded by a single arm and discordance. Taken together, these findings suggest that the two adaptive states were formed concurrently, and without mutual interference. We also observed significant aftereffects. They were smaller but still appreciable under bimanual conditions; the two arms moved at the same time in different directions even though they were aimed at a common visual target. This outcome indicates that the two adaptive states were not merely of a strategic nature, but rather changed the rules by which sensory information was transformed into motor outputs; it also suggests that the two states not only co-exist, but can also be engaged concurrently in movement control. The reduced aftereffects observed under bimanual conditions can be attributed to the well-known phenomenon of bimanual coupling, which is unrelated to adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15754178     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2222-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Shimojo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  J R Tresilian; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Variables affecting the intermanual transfer and decay of prism adaptation.

Authors:  C S Choe; R B Welch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-06

8.  Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects.

Authors:  M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-06

9.  Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement.

Authors:  R B Welch; B Bridgeman; S Anand; K E Browman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

10.  Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders.

Authors:  H G Taylor; K M Heilman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  20 in total

1.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interference between adaptation to double steps and adaptation to rotated feedback in spite of differences in directional selectivity.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inter-limb interference during bimanual adaptation to dynamic environments.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Vittorio Sanguineti; Valentina Squeri; Lorenzo Masia; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Concurrent adaptation to opposite visual distortions: impairment and cue.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-10

6.  Concurrent adaptation of reactive saccades and hand pointing movements to equal and to opposite changes of target direction.

Authors:  Valentina Grigorova; Otmar Bock; Steliana Borisova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor condition does not depend on awareness of the condition.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Mukta Joshi; Yuming Lei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Concurrent adaptation to opposing visual displacements during an alternating movement.

Authors:  J M Galea; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Yan Xiao; Yonghong Yan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Simultaneous acquisition of multiple auditory-motor transformations in speech.

Authors:  Amélie Rochet-Capellan; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.