Literature DB >> 17069314

Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults.

Patti M Johnstone1, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

Speech recognition in noisy environments improves when the speech signal is spatially separated from the interfering sound. This effect, known as spatial release from masking (SRM), was recently shown in young children. The present study compared SRM in children of ages 5-7 with adults for interferers introducing energetic, informational, and/or linguistic components. Three types of interferers were used: speech, reversed speech, and modulated white noise. Two female voices with different long-term spectra were also used. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were compared for: Quiet (target 0 degrees front, no interferer), Front (target and interferer both 0 degrees front), and Right (interferer 90 degrees right, target 0 degrees front). Children had higher SRTs and greater masking than adults. When spatial cues were not available, adults, but not children, were able to use differences in interferer type to separate the target from the interferer. Both children and adults showed SRM. Children, unlike adults, demonstrated large amounts of SRM for a time-reversed speech interferer. In conclusion, masking and SRM vary with the type of interfering sound, and this variation interacts with age; SRM may not depend on the spectral peculiarities of a particular type of voice when the target speech and interfering speech are different sex talkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069314      PMCID: PMC2644459          DOI: 10.1121/1.2225416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

Review 1.  Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects.

Authors:  S Rosen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Frequency-specific maturation of the eighth nerve and brain-stem auditory pathway: evidence from derived auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs).

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; S G Coupland; R Winkelaar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Informational masking and auditory attention.

Authors:  M R Leek; M E Brown; M F Dorman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

5.  An interleaved tracking procedure to monitor unstable psychometric functions.

Authors:  M R Leek; T E Hanna; L Marshall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  How much masking is informational masking?

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency selectivity and comodulation masking release in adults and in 6-year-old children.

Authors:  K Veloso; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-03

8.  Word recognition skills of children and adults in background noise.

Authors:  C F Papso; I M Blood
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Temporal analysis in children.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall; C Gibbs
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-04

10.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  35 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Linguistically-based informational masking in preschool children.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Faraz Ahsan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Monolingual and Bilingual Word Recognition and Word Learning in Background Noise.

Authors:  Giovanna Morini; Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.