Literature DB >> 2776983

Word recognition skills of children and adults in background noise.

C F Papso1, I M Blood.   

Abstract

This study compared the word recognition performance of 4 to 6 year old children and adults on the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) Test presented via sound field in quiet and in a background of multitalker noise and pink noise. Although the adults had no difficulty recognizing speech in all situations, the children performed significantly poorer in both noise conditions. Furthermore, the multitalker noise proved to be more adverse than the pink noise on speech discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2776983     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198908000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  14 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults.

Authors:  Patti M Johnstone; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech.

Authors:  Keiko Ishikawa; Suzanne Boyce; Lisa Kelchner; Maria Golla Powell; Heidi Schieve; Alessandro de Alarcon; Sid Khosla
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Unilateral hearing loss in children: a retrospective study and a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Johannes Friedhoff; Andrea Bohnert; Achim Breitfuss; Markus Hess; Frank Müller; Anke Strauch; Marianne Röhrs; Thomas Wiesner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Eric Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein; Caitlin Rice; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.

Authors:  Elaine C Thompson; Kali Woodruff Carr; Travis White-Schwoch; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Biological impact of preschool music classes on processing speech in noise.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Samantha O'Connell; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effect of Simultaneous Bilingualism on Speech Intelligibility across Different Masker Types, Modalities, and Signal-to-Noise Ratios in School-Age Children.

Authors:  Rachel Reetzke; Boji Pak-Wing Lam; Zilong Xie; Li Sheng; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.