Literature DB >> 1754361

Informational masking and auditory attention.

M R Leek1, M E Brown, M F Dorman.   

Abstract

Informational masking is broadly defined as a degradation of auditory detection or discrimination of a signal embedded in a context of other similar sounds; it is not related to energetic masking caused by physical interactions between signal and masker. In this paper, we report a systematic release from informational masking of a target tone in a nine-tone rapid auditory sequence as the target is increasingly isolated in frequency or intensity from the remaining sequence components. Improved target-tone frequency difference limens as isolation increases are interpreted as a reflection of increasingly focused auditory attention. The change from diffuse to highly focused attention is gradual over the frequency and intensity ranges examined, with each 1-dB increment in target intensity relative to the remaining components producing performance improvements equivalent to those produced by a 2% increase in frequency isolation. The results are modeled as bands of attention in the frequency and intensity domains. For attention directed by frequency isolation, there is a strong correspondence with auditory filters predicted by the power spectrum model of masking. These data also support the existence of an attention band of intensity, with a bandwidth of about 5-7 dB at the moderate levels used in this experiment.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1754361     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Loudness enhancement: monaural, binaural, and dichotic.

Authors:  R Elmasian; R Galambos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. I. Component frequency, temporal position, and silent intervals.

Authors:  C S Watson; H W Wroton; W J Kelly; C A Benbassat
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

4.  Monaural detection with contralateral cue (MDCC). I. Better than energy detector performance by human observers.

Authors:  M M Taylor; S M Forbes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method.

Authors:  G Z Greenberg; W D Larkin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.

Authors:  A S Bregman; J Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-08

7.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Learning to detect auditory pattern components.

Authors:  M R Leek; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pattern-directed attention in uncertain-frequency detection.

Authors:  J H Howard; A J O'Toole; R Parasuraman; K B Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-03

10.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. III. Frequency discrimination with components of well-learned patterns.

Authors:  M F Spiegel; C S Watson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  17 in total

1.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Informational masking release in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comodulation detection differences in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  [Examining informational masking in cochlear implant users].

Authors:  V Pyschny; M Landwehr; M Walger; H von Wedel; H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults.

Authors:  Patti M Johnstone; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Auditory sequential accumulation of spectral information.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spoken word recognition in noise in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cuncun Ren; Jing Yang; Dingjun Zha; Ying Lin; Haihong Liu; Ying Kong; Sha Liu; Li Xu
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.