Literature DB >> 31106697

Monolingual and Bilingual Word Recognition and Word Learning in Background Noise.

Giovanna Morini1, Rochelle S Newman2.   

Abstract

The question of whether bilingualism leads to advantages or disadvantages in linguistic abilities has been debated for many years. It is unclear whether growing up with one versus two languages is related to variations in the ability to process speech in the presence of background noise. We present findings from a word recognition and a word learning task with monolingual and bilingual adults. Bilinguals appear to be less accurate than monolinguals at identifying familiar words in the presence of white noise. However, the bilingual "disadvantage" identified during word recognition is not present when listeners were asked to acquire novel word-object relations that were trained either in noise or in quiet. This work suggests that linguistic experience and the demands associated with the type of task both play a role in the ability for listeners to process speech in noise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilingualism; listening in noise; word learning; word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31106697      PMCID: PMC6861599          DOI: 10.1177/0023830919846158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  22 in total

1.  Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults.

Authors:  Prahlad Gupta
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-10

2.  Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words.

Authors:  M Gareth Gaskell; Nicolas Dumay
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-09

3.  Concreteness effects in bilingual and monolingual word learning.

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Katrina Rechtzigel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

4.  The bilingual advantage in novel word learning.

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

Review 5.  Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

6.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; E S Greetis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots.

Authors:  C Papagno; G Vallar
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1995-02

9.  Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners.

Authors:  Dollen Tabri; Kim Michelle Smith Abou Chacra; Tim Pring
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts.

Authors:  Ray Grondin; Stephen J Lupker; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of monolingual and bilingual toddlers' word recognition in noise.

Authors:  Giovanna Morini; Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Int J Billing       Date:  2021-07-06

2.  Modulation of Cross-Language Activation During Bilingual Auditory Word Recognition: Effects of Language Experience but Not Competing Background Noise.

Authors:  Melinda Fricke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24

3.  Bilinguals' speech perception in noise: Perceptual and neural associations.

Authors:  Dana Bsharat-Maalouf; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.