Literature DB >> 28802434

Evaluation of postural sway and impact forces during ingress and egress of scissor lifts at elevations.

Christopher S Pan1, Sharon S Chiou2, Tsui-Ying Kau3, Bryan M Wimer2, Xiaopeng Ning4, Paul Keane2.   

Abstract

Workers are at risk when entering (ingress) or exiting (egress) elevated scissor lifts. In this study, we recorded ground impact forces and postural sway from 22 construction workers while they performed ingress and egress between a scissor lift and an adjacent work surface with varying conditions: lift opening designs, horizontal and vertical gaps, and sloped work surfaces. We observed higher peak ground shear forces when using a bar-and-chain opening, with larger horizontal gap, with the lift surface more than 0.2 m below the work surface, and presence of a sloped (26°) work surface. Similar trends were observed for postural sway, except that the influence of vertical distance was not significant. To reduce slip/trip/fall risk and postural sway of workers while ingress or egress of an elevated scissor lift, we suggest scissor lifts be equipped with a gate-type opening instead of a bar-and-chain design. We also suggest the lift surface be placed no more than 0.2 m lower than the work surface and the horizontal gap between lift and work surfaces be as small as possible. Selecting a non-sloped surface to ingress or egress a scissor lift is also preferred to reduce risk. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Construction; Egress; Fall hazard; Ingress; Scissor lifts

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28802434      PMCID: PMC5556940          DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  25 in total

Review 1.  Preventing falls from roofs: a critical review.

Authors:  H Hsiao; P Simeonov
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Effects of lumbar extensor fatigue and surface inclination on postural control during quiet stance.

Authors:  Dingding Lin; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Design guidelines for operator entry-exit systems on mobile equipment.

Authors:  D J Bottoms
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Effects of shoe inserts and heel height on foot pressure, impact force, and perceived comfort during walking.

Authors:  Lee Yung-Hui; Hong Wei-Hsien
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Surface slope effects on shingling frequency and postural balance in a simulated roofing task.

Authors:  S D Choi; T K Fredericks
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Effectiveness of vertical visual reference for reducing postural instability on inclined and compliant surfaces at elevation.

Authors:  Peter Simeonov; Hongwei Hsiao; Scott Hendricks
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Foot-ground forces on sloping ground when lifting.

Authors:  Y Zhao; S K Upadhyaya; M S Kaminaka
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights.

Authors:  J L McNitt-Gray
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The changes of lumbar muscle flexion-relaxation response due to laterally slanted ground surfaces.

Authors:  Boyi Hu; Xiaopeng Ning; Ashish D Nimbarte
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.