Literature DB >> 12136382

Limited control strategies with the loss of vestibular function.

Rob Creath1, Tim Kiemel, Fay Horak, John J Jeka.   

Abstract

When subjects stand on an unstable or compliant support surface, rather than a stable one, vestibular information becomes more important for the control of posture. We investigated how subjects with bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) controlled their upright posture, with and without light-touch contact at the fingertip, while standing on a support surface, sinusoidally rotating at different frequencies. Subjects stood with eyes closed on a platform that rotated +/-1.2 degrees around an axis directly beneath the midline of the ankle for frequencies ranging from 0.01 to 0.4 Hz for two sensory conditions: (1) with light, nonsupportive touch (less than 1 N vertical force) on a stationary surface; or (2) with the fingertip held in a position directly above the contact surface (no contact). Gain, phase, and variability of the center of mass (CoM) and the finger were analyzed to compare BVL subjects with healthy controls in the no-touch and light-touch conditions. Three important results were observed: First, CoM gain and variability of BVL subjects was distinctly higher than control subjects with no-touch contact, particularly at the higher platform frequencies. Second, with light-touch contact, BVL and control subjects showed equivalent gain, variability, and phase. Third, multiple relationships between the finger and the CoM were observed in control subjects, whereas BVL subjects implemented a single finger/CoM control scheme. The results are explained in terms of three interacting factors: the transfer function of the vestibular system, a sensory reweighting mechanism, and the inertial properties of the body. Moreover, multiple control strategies observed in control subjects suggest a more flexible control system than that of individuals with severely diminished vestibular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12136382     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1110-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Effects of light fingertip touch on postural responses in subjects with diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  R Dickstein; R J Peterka; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Fay B Horak; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Joint coordination during quiet stance: effects of vision.

Authors:  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy; Jeng-Feng Yang; John P Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Time course of haptic stabilization of posture.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance.

Authors:  Marco Dozza; Fay B Horak; Lorenzo Chiari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Vestibular influences on postural instability induced by movements of the visual environment and support.

Authors:  I V Orlov; Yu K Stolbkov; V S Shuplyakov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03

8.  Effects of artificial feedback to the vestibular input on postural instability induced by asymmetric proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  I V Orlov; Yu K Stolbkov; V C Shuplyakov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02

9.  The role of vestibular and somatosensory systems in intersegmental control of upright stance.

Authors:  Rob Creath; Tim Kiemel; Fay Horak; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 10.  Postural compensation for vestibular loss and implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fay B Horak
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.