Literature DB >> 7869088

Determinants of postural orientation in quadrupedal stance.

J Fung1, J M Macpherson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the determinants of postural orientation by examining stance kinematics and kinetics at various interpaw distances. Four adult cats were trained to stand, unrestrained, on a force platform. Three-dimensional ground reaction forces and kinematics, as well as EMG activities, were recorded during stance at five different anteroposterior (AP) distances and two widths. Stance distance was varied by changing the distance between the four force plates mounted on the platform. All cats used a strategy of maintaining a constant horizontal orientation of the trunk and levering the limbs at the girdles while maintaining constant intralimb geometry to accommodate the changes in stance distance. The direction of the ground reaction forces covaried with the limb axes. As a result, the joint torques were conserved in the forelimb, and varied within small ranges in the hind. Increased tonic activity in the extensors of the back, the hip, and the ankle was observed at shorter distances while increased knee extensor activity was observed at longer distances. A cost function, defined as the sum of squared 3-D joint torques, was minimal for the hindlimb at a stance distance which corresponded to the preferred distance naturally assumed by each cat on the floor. Thus, in the maintenance of stance posture, trunk orientation and intralimb geometry is constrained, the goal of which is to minimize muscular effort or energy expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7869088      PMCID: PMC6577830     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  12 in total

1.  The mechanical action of proprioceptive length feedback in a model of cat hindlimb.

Authors:  T J Burkholder; T R Nicols
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Biomechanical capabilities influence postural control strategies in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Thomas J Burkholder; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Functional muscle synergies constrain force production during postural tasks.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Motor strategies used by rats spinalized at birth to maintain stance in response to imposed perturbations.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Michelle R Davies; Virginia Graziani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults.

Authors:  P Gatev; S Thomas; T Kepple; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Frontal plane dynamics of the centre of mass during quadrupedal locomotion on a split-belt treadmill.

Authors:  E M Latash; W H Barnett; H Park; J M Rider; A N Klishko; B I Prilutsky; Y I Molkov
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Coordination strategies for limb forces during weight-bearing locomotion in normal rats, and in rats spinalized as neonates.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Michelle R Davies; Virginia Graziani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hip and ankle responses for reactive balance emerge from varying priorities to reduce effort and kinematic excursion: A simulation study.

Authors:  Chris S Versteeg; Lena H Ting; Jessica L Allen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.