Literature DB >> 11600630

Forward versus backward walking: transfer of podokinetic adaptation.

G M Earhart1, G M Jones, F B Horak, E W Block, K D Weber, W A Fletcher.   

Abstract

We asked whether podokinetic adaptation to walking on a circular treadmill transfers to different forms of locomotion. Subjects were blindfolded and asked to walk straight across the floor, in the forward and backward directions, following podokinetic (PK) stimulation that consisted of 30 min of forward walking-in-place on the perimeter of a disk rotating in the clockwise direction. During both forward and backward walking following forward-walking PK stimulation, subjects involuntarily walked along curved trajectories at angular velocities well above vestibular threshold, although they perceived that they were walking along straight paths. The curved paths of forward and backward walking were indistinguishable from one another. Transfer of PK adaptations acquired during forward walking on the turntable to backward walking trials suggests that the PK system controls general locomotor trajectory. Adaptation of the system thus influences forms of locomotion other than that used during acquisition of the adaptation. This transfer also supports the concept that forward and backward walking are controlled by neural networks that share common elements. An interesting feature of the transfer of PK adaptation is that for both forward and backward walking, subjects turned in a counterclockwise direction. As such, the direction of relative rotation between the trunk and feet was maintained for both forward and backward walking. However, the relationship of the lower extremities to the center of rotation was not preserved. The left limb was the inner leg during PK stimulation and forward walking after adaptation, but the left leg was the outer leg during backward walking. These results suggest that PK adaptation affects general locomotor trajectory via a remodeling of the rotational relationship between the trunk and the feet.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11600630     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

1.  Similar muscles contribute to horizontal and vertical acceleration of center of mass in forward and backward walking: implications for neural control.

Authors:  Karen Jansen; Friedl De Groote; Firas Massaad; Pieter Meyns; Jacques Duysens; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Postural reorientation does not cause the locomotor after-effect following rotary locomotion.

Authors:  Callum J Osler; Raymond F Reynolds
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Podokinetic stimulation causes shifts in perception of straight ahead.

Authors:  John T Scott; Corey A Lohnes; Fay B Horak; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Specificity and variability of trunk kinematics on a mechanical horse.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Cody Barrett; Jonathan Rylander; Brian Garner
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Fay B Horak; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Changes in perception of active but not passive turning following stepping on the rotating treadmill.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Stevens; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Exposure to a rotating virtual environment during treadmill locomotion causes adaptation in heading direction.

Authors:  A P Mulavara; J T Richards; T Ruttley; A Marshburn; Y Nomura; J J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Walking and running on the circular treadmill: transition speed and podokinetic aftereffects.

Authors:  Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Generalization of gait adaptation for fall prevention: from moveable platform to slippery floor.

Authors:  T Bhatt; Y C Pai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.