Literature DB >> 16982428

Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Katherine I Nagel1, Allison J Doupe.   

Abstract

Songbird auditory neurons must encode the dynamics of natural sounds at many volumes. We investigated how neural coding depends on the distribution of stimulus intensities. Using reverse-correlation, we modeled responses to amplitude-modulated sounds as the output of a linear filter and a nonlinear gain function, then asked how filters and nonlinearities depend on the stimulus mean and variance. Filter shape depended strongly on mean amplitude (volume): at low mean, most neurons integrated sound over many milliseconds, while at high mean, neurons responded more to local changes in amplitude. Increasing the variance (contrast) of amplitude modulations had less effect on filter shape but decreased the gain of firing in most cells. Both filter and gain changes occurred rapidly after a change in statistics, suggesting that they represent nonlinearities in processing. These changes may permit neurons to signal effectively over a wider dynamic range and are reminiscent of findings in other sensory systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982428     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  91 in total

1.  Linking the computational structure of variance adaptation to biophysical mechanisms.

Authors:  Yusuf Ozuysal; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Parallel coding of first- and second-order stimulus attributes by midbrain electrosensory neurons.

Authors:  Patrick McGillivray; Katrin Vonderschen; Eric S Fortune; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Time course of dynamic range adaptation in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

5.  Adaptive coding is constrained to midline locations in a spatial listening task.

Authors:  J K Maier; P Hehrmann; N S Harper; G M Klump; D Pressnitzer; D McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Maximally informative pairwise interactions in networks.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Fitzgerald; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.