Literature DB >> 21964794

Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Eric Larson1, Ross K Maddox, Ben P Perrone, Kamal Sen, Cyrus P Billimoria.   

Abstract

The auditory system is capable of robust recognition of sounds in the presence of competing maskers (e.g., other voices or background music). This capability arises despite the fact that masking stimuli can disrupt neural responses at the cortical level. Since the origins of such interference effects remain unknown, in this study, we work to identify and quantify neural interference effects that originate due to masking occurring within and outside receptive fields of neurons. We record from single and multi-unit auditory sites from field L, the auditory cortex homologue in zebra finches. We use a novel method called spike timing-based stimulus filtering that uses the measured response of each neuron to create an individualized stimulus set. In contrast to previous adaptive experimental approaches, which have typically focused on the average firing rate, this method uses the complete pattern of neural responses, including spike timing information, in the calculation of the receptive field. When we generate and present novel stimuli for each neuron that mask the regions within the receptive field, we find that the time-varying information in the neural responses is disrupted, degrading neural discrimination performance and decreasing spike timing reliability and sparseness. We also find that, while removing stimulus energy from frequency regions outside the receptive field does not significantly affect neural responses for many sites, adding a masker in these frequency regions can nonetheless have a significant impact on neural responses and discriminability without a significant change in the average firing rate. These findings suggest that maskers can interfere with neural responses by disrupting stimulus timing information with power either within or outside the receptive fields of neurons.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964794      PMCID: PMC3254720          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0292-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  35 in total

1.  Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Hartmut Schütze; Astrid Franz; Olga Kolesnikova; Martin B Stemmler; Bernhard Ronacher; Andreas V M Herz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Julie A Grace; Noopur Amin; Nandini C Singh; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds.

Authors:  Rajiv Narayan; Gilberto Graña; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Auditory processing of vocal sounds in birds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Sarita S Shaevitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  The consequences of response nonlinearities for interpretation of spectrotemporal receptive fields.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; Maneesh Sahani; Jennifer F Linden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Cyrus P Billimoria; Benjamin J Kraus; Rajiv Narayan; Ross K Maddox; Kamal Sen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Patterned tone sequences reveal non-linear interactions in auditory spectrotemporal receptive fields in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; William E O'Neill
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  S H Hulse; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; A B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Roles of the auditory midbrain and thalamus in selective phonotaxis in female gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor).

Authors:  Heike Endepols; Albert S Feng; H Carl Gerhardt; Johannes Schul; Wolfgang Walkowiak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of slow (theta) oscillations as a potential temporal reference frame for information coding in sensory cortices.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Robin A A Ince; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Competing sound sources reveal spatial effects in cortical processing.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Cyrus P Billimoria; Ben P Perrone; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Kamal Sen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.029

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.