Literature DB >> 22773777

Adaptive coding is constrained to midline locations in a spatial listening task.

J K Maier1, P Hehrmann, N S Harper, G M Klump, D Pressnitzer, D McAlpine.   

Abstract

Many neurons adapt their spike output to accommodate the prevailing sensory environment. Although such adaptation is thought to improve coding of relevant stimulus features, the relationship between adaptation at the neural and behavioral levels remains to be established. Here we describe improved discrimination performance for an auditory spatial cue (interaural time differences, ITDs) following adaptation to stimulus statistics. Physiological recordings in the midbrain of anesthetized guinea pigs and measurement of discrimination performance in humans both demonstrate improved coding of the most prevalent ITDs in a distribution, but with highest accuracy maintained for ITDs corresponding to frontal locations, suggesting the existence of a fovea for auditory space. A biologically plausible model accounting for the physiological data suggests that neural tuning is stabilized by inhibition to maintain high discriminability for frontal locations. The data support the notion that adaptive coding in the midbrain is a key element of behaviorally efficient sound localization in dynamic acoustic environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22773777      PMCID: PMC4422344          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00652.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

1.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The auditory periphery of the ferret. I: Directional response properties and the pattern of interaural level differences.

Authors:  S Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Responses of neurons in the rat's dorsal cortex of the inferior colliculus to monaural tone bursts.

Authors:  Ariana Lumani; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Michael J Anderson; Omer Bar-Yosef; Eric D Young; Naftali Tishby; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Efficient auditory coding.

Authors:  Evan C Smith; Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Stimulus-specific adaptations in the gaze control system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Amit Reches; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Specialized neuronal adaptation for preserving input sensitivity.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Stimulus-specific adaptation and its dynamics in the inferior colliculus of rat.

Authors:  L Zhao; Y Liu; L Shen; L Feng; B Hong
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the anesthetized rat.

Authors:  Manuel S Malmierca; Salvatore Cristaudo; David Pérez-González; Ellen Covey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Adaptation in sound localization: from GABA(B) receptor-mediated synaptic modulation to perception.

Authors:  Annette Stange; Michael H Myoga; Andrea Lingner; Marc C Ford; Olga Alexandrova; Felix Felmy; Michael Pecka; Ida Siveke; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Directing eye gaze enhances auditory spatial cue discrimination.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Dean A Pospisil; G Christopher Stecker; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Visual task enhances spatial selectivity in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Joanna Aho; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Efficient coding of spectrotemporal binaural sounds leads to emergence of the auditory space representation.

Authors:  Wiktor Młynarski
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Bilateral gain control; an "innate predisposition" for all sorts of things.

Authors:  Nicholas Wilkinson; Giorgio Metta
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Coding accuracy on the psychophysical scale.

Authors:  Lubomir Kostal; Petr Lansky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Moth olfactory receptor neurons adjust their encoding efficiency to temporal statistics of pheromone fluctuations.

Authors:  Marie Levakova; Lubomir Kostal; Christelle Monsempès; Vincent Jacob; Philippe Lucas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Cooperative population coding facilitates efficient sound-source separability by adaptation to input statistics.

Authors:  Helge Gleiss; Jörg Encke; Andrea Lingner; Todd R Jennings; Sonja Brosel; Lars Kunz; Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Cortical modulation of auditory processing in the midbrain.

Authors:  Victoria M Bajo; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Statistics of natural binaural sounds.

Authors:  Wiktor Młynarski; Jürgen Jost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.