Literature DB >> 20457692

Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Paul V Watkins1, Dennis L Barbour.   

Abstract

The responses of auditory neurons tuned to stimulus intensity (i.e., nonmonotonic rate-level responders) have typically been analyzed with stimulus paradigms that eliminate neuronal adaptation to recent stimulus statistics. This procedure is usually accomplished by presenting individual sounds with long silent periods between them. Studies using such paradigms have led to hypotheses that nonmonotonic neurons may play a role in amplitude spectrum coding or level-invariant representations of complex spectral shapes. We have previously proposed an alternate hypothesis that level-tuned neurons may represent specialized coders of low sound levels because they preserve their sensitivity to low levels even when average sound level is relatively high. Here we demonstrate that nonmonotonic neurons in awake marmoset primary auditory cortex accomplish this feat by adapting their upper dynamic range to encode sounds with high mean level, leaving the lower dynamic range available for encoding relatively rare low-level sounds. This adaptive behavior manifests in nonmonotonic relative to monotonic neurons as 1) a lesser amount of overall shifting of rate-level response thresholds and (2) a nonmonotonic gain adjustment with increasing mean stimulus level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457692      PMCID: PMC3000570          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  49 in total

1.  Microelectrode studies of the cochlear nuclei of the cat.

Authors:  J E ROSE; R GALAMBOS; J R HUGHES
Journal:  Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp       Date:  1959-05

2.  Microelectrode studies on medial geniculate body of cat. III. Response to pure tones.

Authors:  R GALAMBOS
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1952-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Associative learning shapes the neural code for stimulus magnitude in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Marc A Heiser; David T Blake; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Long-lasting modulation by stimulus context in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Nonmonotonic synaptic excitation and imbalanced inhibition underlying cortical intensity tuning.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Pingyang Li; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Elizabeth E Steinberg; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Patterns of inhibition in auditory cortical cells in awake squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  S A Shamma; D Symmes
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Isabel Dean; Nicol S Harper; David McAlpine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Tuning curves, neuronal variability, and sensory coding.

Authors:  Daniel A Butts; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  27 in total

1.  Inferring the role of inhibition in auditory processing of complex natural stimuli.

Authors:  Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma; Daniel A Butts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis and perception.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Adam M Gifford; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Stimulus-timing-dependent modifications of rate-level functions in animals with and without tinnitus.

Authors:  Roxana A Stefanescu; Seth D Koehler; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Gain Control in the Auditory Cortex Evoked by Changing Temporal Correlation of Sounds.

Authors:  Ryan G Natan; Isaac M Carruthers; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Maria N Geffen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Harnessing plasticity to understand learning and treat disease.

Authors:  Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Decoding sound level in the marmoset primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Wensheng Sun; Ellisha N Marongelli; Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Rate-level responses in awake marmoset auditory cortex.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.