Literature DB >> 16947063

Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.

Joo-Hyun Song1, Ken Nakayama.   

Abstract

Turning off a fixation point, typically for 200 ms, before the onset of a peripheral target substantially reduces saccadic reaction times. This facilitatory effect generated by an inserted temporal gap between fixation offset and the target appearance is called the "gap" effect [J Opt Soc Am 57:1030-1033, 1967]. We show that the gap reduces the initial latency of both saccades and manual pointing in single and multiple target displays. Yet, in multiple target displays, the gap increased the movement duration because eye or hand movements were frequently misdirected toward distractors so that the trajectory had to be corrected. Thus, in spite of the shortened latency, the total time for trial completion was not shortened in multiple target displays, whereas it was reduced in single target displays. This selective gap effect for a single target was not restricted to goal-directed motor tasks because perceptual discrimination tasks, where no motor response is required, also demonstrated the gap effect only for single target displays. Our results suggest that the gap may facilitate attentional disengagement, but it does not help target selection in motor and perceptual discrimination tasks, where the allocation of attention to the target is required.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16947063     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0667-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The Gap effect for spatially oriented responses.

Authors:  J Pratt; H Bekkering; R A Abrams; J Adam
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-07

3.  Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present.

Authors:  Kuniharu Arai; Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Short-term priming, concurrent processing, and saccade curvature during a target selection task in the monkey.

Authors:  R M McPeek; E L Keller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Fischer; B Breitmeyer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Antimo Buonocore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Roles of narrow- and broad-spiking dorsal premotor area neurons in reach target selection and movement production.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Goal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jonathan Sit; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Naomi Takahashi; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ueda; Kohske Takahashi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: evidence for a perceptual gap effect.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Allocation of attention for dissociated visual and motor goals.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Patrick Bédard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Perceptual decision processes flexibly adapt to avoid change-of-mind motor costs.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.