Literature DB >> 22684944

Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.

Robert D McIntosh1, Antimo Buonocore.   

Abstract

The remote distractor effect (RDE) is a robust phenomenon whereby target-directed saccades are delayed by the appearance of a distractor. This effect persists even when the target location is perfectly predictable. The RDE has been studied extensively in the oculomotor domain but it is unknown whether it generalises to other spatially oriented responses. In three experiments, we tested whether the RDE generalises to manual aiming. Experiment 1 required participants to move their hand or eyes to predictable targets presented alone or accompanied by a distractor in the opposite hemifield. The RDE was observed for the eyes but not for the hand. Experiment 2 replicated this dissociation in a more naturalistic task in which eye movements were not constrained during manual aiming. Experiment 3 confirmed the lack of manual RDE across a wider range of distractor delays (0, 50, 100, and 150 ms). Our data imply that the RDE is specific to the oculomotor system, at least for non-foveal distractors. We suggest that the oculomotor RDE reflects competitive interactions between target and distractor representations in the superior colliculus, which are not necessarily shared by manual aiming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22684944     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3119-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  The Gap effect for spatially oriented responses.

Authors:  J Pratt; H Bekkering; R A Abrams; J Adam
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-07

2.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Alla Ignashchenkova; Peter W Dicke; Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series.

Authors:  N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury; D E Young; L Proteau
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The magnitude of the fixation offset effect with endogenously and exogenously controlled saccades.

Authors:  K Forbes; R M Klein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Temporal dynamics of saccadic distraction.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: a retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase.

Authors:  W Fries
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-11-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.

Authors:  J D Fisk; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field.

Authors:  R Rafal; J Smith; J Krantz; A Cohen; C Brennan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jesse C DeSimone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Craig Hedge; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Multisensory temporal binding induces an illusory gap/overlap that reduces the expected audiovisual interactions on saccades but not manual responses.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Françoise Vitu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.