Literature DB >> 24986186

Perceptual decision processes flexibly adapt to avoid change-of-mind motor costs.

Jeff Moher1, Joo-Hyun Song2.   

Abstract

The motor system is tightly linked with perception and cognition. Recent studies have shown that even anticipated biophysical action costs associated with competing response options can be incorporated into decision-making processes. As a result, choices associated with high energy costs are less likely to be selected. However, some action costs may be harder to predict. For example, a person choosing among apples at a grocery store may change his or her mind suddenly about which apple to put into the cart. This change of mind may be reflected in motor output as the initial decision triggers a motor response toward a Granny Smith that is subsequently redirected toward a Red Delicious. In the present study, to examine how motor costs associated with changes of mind affect perceptual decision making, participants performed a difficult random dot–motion discrimination task in which they had to indicate the direction of motion by reaching to one of two response options. Although each response box was always equidistant from the starting position, the physical distance between the two response options was varied. We found that when the boxes were far apart from one another, and thus changes of mind incurred greater redirection motor costs, change-of-mind frequency decreased while latency to initiate movement increased. This occurred even when response box distance varied randomly from trial to trial and was cued only 1 s before each trial began. Thus, we demonstrated that observers can dynamically adjust perceptual decision-making processes to avoid high motor costs incurred by a change of mind.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  changes of mind; movement trajectories; perceptual decision making; visually guided action

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986186      PMCID: PMC4528411          DOI: 10.1167/14.8.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  39 in total

1.  Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search.

Authors:  R M McPeek; A A Skavenski; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Making decisions through a distributed consensus.

Authors:  Paul Cisek
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

Review 7.  Neurobiology of economic choice: a good-based model.

Authors:  Camillo Padoa-Schioppa
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Integration of sensory and reward information during perceptual decision-making in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Alan E Rorie; Juan Gao; James L McClelland; William T Newsome
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A multiple-choice task with changes of mind.

Authors:  Larissa Albantakis; Francesca M Branzi; Albert Costa; Gustavo Deco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: hand-centred effects.

Authors:  Debra Griffiths; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Katie A Smith; Jeff Moher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Computations in Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-04-07

Review 4.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Slowing the body slows down time perception.

Authors:  Rose De Kock; Weiwei Zhou; Wilsaan M Joiner; Martin Wiener
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Motor cortex activity predicts response alternation during sensorimotor decisions.

Authors:  Anna-Antonia Pape; Markus Siegel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Ariel Zylberberg; Roozbeh Kiani; Michael N Shadlen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Rapid target foraging with reach or gaze: The hand looks further ahead than the eye.

Authors:  Jonathan S Diamond; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Motor modules account for active perception of force.

Authors:  Simone Toma; Marco Santello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Kavitha Anandalingam; Ariel Zylberberg; Roozbeh Kiani; Michael N Shadlen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.