Literature DB >> 18797854

The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process.

Giovanni Mirabella1, Pierpaolo Pani, Stefano Ferraina.   

Abstract

A milestone on which relies the voluntary control of behavior is the ability to shape our motor output to meet the needs of the context which we are continuously facing. Even though it is solidly established that contextual information influence movement generation few studies have so far explored their effects on inhibitory processes. We compared the inhibitory control of arm movements of ten healthy right-handed volunteers in a countermanding reaching paradigm with and without the presence of a temporal gap between the offset of the central target and the peripheral target appearance. We found that this perceptual gap reduces the reaction times of hand movements and, at the same time, increases the duration of the stop process, the stop signal reaction time. The two effects are not correlated implying that inhibition and execution of reaching movement are two independent processes influenced by a common factor: the disengagement of selective attention from the central target. Therefore our results support the idea of the existence of a link between spatial selective attention and inhibitory processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18797854     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1570-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  76 in total

1.  The Gap effect for spatially oriented responses.

Authors:  J Pratt; H Bekkering; R A Abrams; J Adam
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-07

2.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 6.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Leanne Boucher; Thomas J Palmeri; Gordon D Logan; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The predictive value for performance speed of preparatory changes in neuronal activity of the monkey motor and premotor cortex.

Authors:  A Riehle; J Requin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-02-26       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; D J Crammond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Mark G Stokes; Tracy R Henderson; Hugh Garavan; Ian H Robertson; Adam P Morris; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  13 in total

1.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Preparation and inhibition of interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese M Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process.

Authors:  Roberto Montanari; Margherita Giamundo; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina; Pierpaolo Pani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements.

Authors:  Paolo Federico; Giovanni Mirabella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Volitional inhibition and brain-machine interfaces: a mandatory wedding.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-08-28

6.  Stimulation of subthalamic nuclei restores a near normal planning strategy in Parkinson's patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Sara Iaconelli; Nicola Modugno; Giorgio Giannini; Francesco Lena; Gianpaolo Cantore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stop-event-related potentials from intracranial electrodes reveal a key role of premotor and motor cortices in stopping ongoing movements.

Authors:  M Mattia; S Spadacenta; L Pavone; P Quarato; V Esposito; A Sparano; F Sebastiano; G Di Gennaro; R Morace; G Cantore; G Mirabella
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-06-29

8.  Adaptive proactive inhibitory control for embedded real-time applications.

Authors:  Shufan Yang; T Martin McGinnity; Kongfatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-06-11

9.  Spatial frequency information modulates response inhibition and decision-making processes.

Authors:  Sara Jahfari; K Richard Ridderinkhof; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cerebellar damage impairs executive control and monitoring of movement generation.

Authors:  Emiliano Brunamonti; Francesca R Chiricozzi; Silvia Clausi; Giusy Olivito; Maria Assunta Giusti; Marco Molinari; Stefano Ferraina; Maria Leggio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.