Literature DB >> 14561691

Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present.

Kuniharu Arai1, Robert M McPeek, Edward L Keller.   

Abstract

Important insights into the neural organization of the saccadic system have been gained when the usually stereotyped movement trajectories of saccades have been altered by experimental manipulation. In the present study we produced trajectory variability in monkeys by using a visual search task in which both the location and color of an odd-colored target were changed randomly trial by trial, and the number of distractors was varied on each trial. We wished to determine whether increasing the number of distractors also increased the movement trajectory variation, i.e., the amount of initial directional deviation, endpoint deviation (averaging), and curvature of saccades. Overall, saccade latencies and the proportion of saccades directed to distractors decreased as the number of homogenous distractors increased. We also found that saccades have much more dispersion in their initial direction when distractors are present in comparison to the case when only a single target without distractors appears. However, initial dispersion decreases systematically as the number of distractors increases. The percentage of averaging saccades produced in the search task was not consistently dependent on the number of distractors. A significant fraction of averaging saccades still occurred for much wider spatial separations of stimuli than in previous studies using two visual stimuli with no specified target. The curvature of saccade trajectories increased dramatically when distractors were present, but the amount of curvature was not systematically affected by the number of distractors. Errors present in saccade trajectory in the search task were only poorly compensated. We conclude that these variable saccade trajectories result from incomplete or inaccurate specification of the target when competing stimuli are present and that a smaller number of more widely spread distractors facilitate saccade variability, perhaps due to the greater difficulty of target selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561691     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00818.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  A test of spatial temporal decoding mechanisms in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; A J Van Opstal; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  'Alternate-goal bias' in antisaccades and the influence of expectation.

Authors:  Mathias Abegg; Amadeo R Rodriguez; Hyung Lee; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Looking away: distractor influences on saccadic trajectory and endpoint in prosaccade and antisaccade tasks.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Mona J H Zhu; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preparation and execution of saccades: the problem of limited capacity of computational resources.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Yu Jin; Stefan Schumann; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Incomplete suppression of distractor-related activity in the frontal eye field results in curved saccades.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Naomi Takahashi; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Behavioral properties of saccades generated as a choice response.

Authors:  P D Thiem; J A Hill; K-M Lee; E L Keller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effects of distractors and spatial precues on covert visual search in macaque.

Authors:  Byeong-Taek Lee; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Faces distort eye movement trajectories, but the distortion is not stronger for your own face.

Authors:  Haoyue Qian; Xiangping Gao; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.