Literature DB >> 23417647

Allocation of attention for dissociated visual and motor goals.

Joo-Hyun Song1, Patrick Bédard.   

Abstract

In daily life, selecting an object visually is closely intertwined with processing that object as a potential goal for action. Since visual and motor goals are typically identical, it remains unknown whether attention is primarily allocated to a visual target, a motor goal, or both. Here, we dissociated visual and motor goals using a visuomotor adaptation paradigm, in which participants reached toward a visual target using a computer mouse or a stylus pen, while the direction of the cursor was rotated 45° counter-clockwise from the direction of the hand movement. Thus, as visuomotor adaptation was accomplished, the visual target was dissociated from the movement goal. Then, we measured the locus of attention using an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task, in which participants detected a pre-defined visual stimulus among the successive visual stimuli presented on either the visual target, the motor goal, or a neutral control location. We demonstrated that before visuomotor adaptation, participants performed better when the RSVP stream was presented at the visual target than at other locations. However, once visual and motor goals were dissociated following visuomotor adaptation, performance at the visual and motor goals was equated and better than performance at the control location. Therefore, we concluded that attentional resources are allocated both to visual target and motor goals during goal-directed reaching movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417647     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3426-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  76 in total

1.  Effects of attention on the reliability of individual neurons in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  C J McAdams; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Separate signals for target selection and movement specification in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  G D Horwitz; W T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades.

Authors:  Timothy M Gersch; Eileen Kowler; Barbara Dosher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability.

Authors:  M A Basso; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Basal ganglia-dependent processes in recalling learned visual-motor adaptations.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

10.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Encoding attentional states during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Patrick Bédard; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Impaired visuomotor generalization by inconsistent attentional contexts.

Authors:  Tony S L Wang; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression.

Authors:  Hanna Gertz; Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Paradoxical benefits of dual-task contexts for visuomotor memory.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Patrick Bédard
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Age and Cognitive Stress Influences Motor Skill Acquisition, Consolidation, and Dual-Task Effect in Humans.

Authors:  Keith R Cole; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Effects of variability of practice in music: a pilot study on fast goal-directed movements in pianists.

Authors:  Marc Bangert; Anna Wiedemann; Hans-Christian Jabusch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Suppression of mutually incompatible proprioceptive and visual action effects in tool use.

Authors:  Marvin Liesner; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.