Literature DB >> 16944161

High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Winfried A Willinek1, Thomas Bayer, Jürgen Gieseke, Marcus von Falkenhausen, Torsten Sommer, Romhild Hoogeveen, Kai Wilhelm, Horst Urbach, Hans H Schild.   

Abstract

To examine whether the the increased signal-to-noise (S/N) available at 3.0T would permit the use of the quadrature body coil for high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography (MRA), and whether the large FOV that was used in our routine 1.5T protocol would also be feasible at 3.0T. In a prospective study, 43 patients and five volunteers were examined on a clinical whole-body 3.0T MR unit (Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) after institutional review board approval and informed consent. Three-dimensional CE MRA (T1 gradient echo-sequence with TR/TE = 5.7/1.93 msec.; acquisition time, 1:54 min.) using randomly segmented central k-space ordering (CENTRA) was acquired with the quadrature body coil, using over a FOV of 350 mm. A high-image matrix of 432x432 yielded a non-zero filled voxel size of 0.81 mm x 0.81 mm x 1.0 mm (0.66 mm(3)). For quantitative analysis, contrast ratios (CR) between vessels (S) and signal in surrounding tissue (ST) were calculated [(S-ST)/(S+ST)]. For qualitative analysis, image quality and presence of artifacts were rated by two radiologists in consensus on a five-point scale (1=excellent to 5=nondiagnostic). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as the standard of reference in patients with vascular disease. In the five volunteers, 1.5T CE MRA using a phased array neurovascular coil was available for intraindividual comparison. 3.0T CE MRA was successfully performed in 48/48 subjects (100%). Mean CR+/- SD were 0.76 (139.30/182.42) and 0.87 (235.18/270.14) at 3.0T and 1.5T respectively . Mean image quality was 3.82+/-0.86. Intraindividual comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T CE MRA in the volunteers revealed no significant difference in image quality (4.2+/-0.74 vs 4.6+/-0.80; p>0.05). Vascular disease was correctly identified in 13/13 patients with DSA correlation. CE MRA of the supraaortic arteries is feasible at 3.0T using a large FOV of 350 mm. The signal gain at 3.0T enables high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography by using the built-in quadrature body coil only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944161     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0406-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; J Huston; C Lin; G F Gibbs; J P Felmlee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Markus Born; Birgit Simon; Henriette J Tschampa; Carsten Krautmacher; Jurgen Gieseke; Horst Urbach; Hans J Textor; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Clinical experience on 3.0 T systems in Niigata, 1996 to 2002.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nakada
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging.

Authors:  K Turetschek; P Wunderbaldinger; A A Bankier; T Zontsich; O Graf; R Mallek; K Hittmair
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  3.0-Tesla MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced techniques.

Authors:  Gordon F Gibbs; John Huston; Matthew A Bernstein; Stephen J Riederer; Robert D Brown
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.

Authors:  Christoph Manka; Frank Träber; Juergen Gieseke; Hans H Schild; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Lung MRI at 3.0 T: a comparison of helical CT and high-field MRI in the detection of diffuse lung disease.

Authors:  G Lutterbey; J Gieseke; M von Falkenhausen; N Morakkabati; H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Brain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T--Initial Experience.

Authors:  Carsten Krautmacher; Winfried A Willinek; Henriette J Tschampa; Mark Born; Frank Träber; Jürgen Gieseke; Hans J Textor; Hans H Schild; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography.

Authors:  Gordon F Gibbs; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Stephen J Riederer; Robert D Brown
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  8 in total

1.  Quality-evaluation scheme for cerebral time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography techniques.

Authors:  H Raoult; J-C Ferré; X Morandi; B Carsin-Nicol; M Carsin; M Cuggia; M Law; J-Y Gauvrit
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T, improved spatial resolution and low dose contrast: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Kambiz Nael; Mayil Krishnam; Ali Nael; Anthony Ton; Stefan G Ruehm; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Carotid MR angiography with traditional bolus timing: clinical observations and Fourier-based modelling of contrast kinetics.

Authors:  Jan Menke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Impact of 3.0 T Cardiac MR Imaging Using Dual-Source Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission with Patient-Adaptive B1 Shimming.

Authors:  Haipeng Jia; Cuiyan Wang; Guangbin Wang; Lei Qu; Weibo Chen; Queenie Chan; Bin Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Holy Grail in diagnostic neuroradiology: 3T or 3D?

Authors:  Frederik Barkhof; Petra J W Pouwels; Mike P Wattjes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of isotropic ankle magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional isotropic intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo versus three-dimensional isotropic fast field echo sequences.

Authors:  Hyun Su Kim; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon; Bong-Keun Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques.

Authors:  Jan Menke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Nonenhanced hybridized arterial spin labeled magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries using a fast low angle shot readout at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Matthew T Walker; Joel R Meyer; Ian G Murphy; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.364

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.