Literature DB >> 15665227

Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.

Christoph Manka1, Frank Träber, Juergen Gieseke, Hans H Schild, Christiane K Kuhl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate if T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility-weighted first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is feasible at 3.0 T and which dose of contrast agent is suitable for high-field-strength imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from all participants; study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. Study included three volunteers (two men, one woman aged 35, 39, and 52 years) and 26 patients (mean age, 49 years +/- 12.8 [standard deviation]; range, 19-76 years). Volunteers underwent 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with 0.20, 0.10, and 0.05 mmol per kilogram body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine; patients underwent imaging with 0.10- and 0.05-mmol doses. Perfusion MR imaging was performed with three-dimensional echo-shifted echo-planar imaging (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 14/21; isotropic 4 mm3 voxels; 50 dynamic volumes with 30 sections each, covering entire brain at temporal resolution of 1.5 seconds per MR image). Quality of source echo-planar images and perfusion maps was assessed; perfusion maps obtained at studies with different contrast media doses were compared. Quantitative perfusion values and diagnostic sensitivity of perfusion studies with 0.10-mmol dose were compared with results with 0.05-mmol dose. Image quality scores were compared with marginal homogeneity test for multinomial variables (Mantel-Haenszel statistics for ordered categorized values). Signal-to-noise ratio and baseline signal intensity in perfusion studies were tested (Student t test for paired samples). Mean transit time (MTT), negative integral (NI), and maximum T2* effect from region-of-interest analysis were compared (one-tailed Student t test for paired samples). Quantitative data on number of gamma-fitted pixels were compared (t test for paired samples). Difference with P=.05 (t test for paired samples) was considered significant.
RESULTS: Perfusion image quality was satisfactory even in areas close to skull base (47 of 52 images, minor distortions; remaining images, marked distortions). Perfusion imaging with 0.20-mmol dose caused almost complete signal cancellation during first pass, particularly in cortical gray matter, since mean maximum T2* effect of 98%, 99%, and 98% for gray matter was reached such that the accurate calculation of perfusion maps was impossible. With 0.10-mmol dose, the NI and maximum T2* effect were comparable to published data for 1.5-T perfusion imaging with 0.20- and 0.05-mmol doses; perfusion maps of sufficient diagnostic quality were obtained. For gray matter, mean maximum T2* effect was 25.4% +/- 9.8 with 0.10-mmol dose and 17.5% +/- 9.0 with 0.05-mmol dose. For white matter, mean maximum T2* effect was 15.2% +/- 4.5 with 0.10-mmol dose and 7.7% +/- 2.9 with 0.05-mmol dose. Difference in maximum signal intensity decrease was significant (P <.01). For NI, the difference between 0.10- and 0.05-mmol doses was significant: For gray matter, mean NI was 3.1 +/- 1.60 for 0.10-mmol dose and 1.56 +/- 1.16 for 0.05-mmol dose. For white matter, mean NI was 1.35 +/- 0.59 with 0.1-mmol dose and 0.59 +/- 0.30 with 0.05-mmol dose.
CONCLUSION: With echo-shifted multishot echo-planar imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at high field strength is feasible without relevant image distortions. Compared with contrast agent dose for 1.5 T imaging, the dose for 3.0 T can be reduced to 0.10 mmol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15665227     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2343040359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Thomas Bayer; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Torsten Sommer; Romhild Hoogeveen; Kai Wilhelm; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Tommaso Scarabino; Francesca Trojsi; Giuseppe M Giannatempo; Teresa Popolizio; Domenico Catapano; Simona Bonavita; Nicola Maggialetti; Michela Tosetti; Ugo Salvolini; Vincenzo A d'Angelo; Giocchino Tedeschi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI.

Authors:  Siegfried Trattnig; Kathia Pinker; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Iris-Melanie Nöbauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis: dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Sumita Adhya; Glyn Johnson; Joseph Herbert; Hina Jaggi; James S Babb; Robert I Grossman; Matilde Inglese
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Absolute quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: pitfalls and possibilities.

Authors:  Linda Knutsson; Freddy Ståhlberg; Ronnie Wirestam
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Combined low-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion for acute ischemic stroke at 3T: A more efficient stroke protocol.

Authors:  K Nael; A Meshksar; B Ellingson; M Pirastehfar; N Salamon; P Finn; D S Liebeskind; J P Villablanca
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  The PRESTO technique for fMRI.

Authors:  P van Gelderen; J H Duyn; N F Ramsey; G Liu; C T W Moonen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Matilde Inglese; Sumita Adhya; Glyn Johnson; James S Babb; Laura Miles; Hina Jaggi; Joseph Herbert; Robert I Grossman
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging.

Authors:  Eiji Matsusue; James R Fink; Jason K Rockhill; Toshihide Ogawa; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Contrast agent dose effects in cerebral dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jeffry R Alger; Timothy J Schaewe; Tom C Lai; Andrew J Frew; Paul M Vespa; Maria Etchepare; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; S Chelsea Kidwell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.