Literature DB >> 11675648

High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

M A Bernstein1, J Huston, C Lin, G F Gibbs, J P Felmlee.   

Abstract

Initial experience with intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T is reported. Phantom measurements (corrected for relaxation effects) show S/N (3.0T) = 2.14 +/- 0.08 x S/N (1.5T) in identical-geometry head coils. A 3.0T 3DTOF intracranial imaging protocol with higher-order autoshimming was developed and compared to 1.5T 3DTOF in 12 patients with aneurysms. A comparison by two radiologists showed the 3.0T to be significantly better (P < 0.001) for visualization of the aneurysms. The feasibility of cervical and intracranial contrast enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) at 3.0T is also examined. The relaxivity of the gadolinium contrast agent decreases by only about 4-7% when the field strength is increased from 1.5 to 3.0T. Cervical 3.0T CEMRA was obtained in eight patients, two of whom had 1.5T studies available for direct comparison. Image comparison suggests 3.0T to be a favorable field strength for cervical CEMRA. Voxel volumes of 0.62-0.73 mm(3) (not including zero-filling) were readily achieved at 3.0T with the use of a single-channel transmit-receive head or cervical coil, a 25 mL bolus of gadoteridol, and a 3D pulse sequence with a 66% sampling efficiency. This spatial resolution allowed visualization of intracranial aneurysms, carotid dissections, and atherosclerotic disease including ulcerations. Potential drawbacks of 3.0T MRA are increased SAR and T(*)(2) dephasing compared to 1.5T. Image comparison suggests signal loss due to T(*)(2) dephasing will not be substantially more problematic than at 1.5T. The dependence of RF power deposition on TR for CEMRA is calculated and discussed. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11675648     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  39 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical MR at 3 Tesla: current status].

Authors:  K T Baudendistel; J T Heverhagen; M V Knopp
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T.

Authors:  W Schwindt; H Kugel; R Bachmann; S Kloska; T Allkemper; D Maintz; B Pfleiderer; B Tombach; W Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The high-field-strength curmudgeon.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Time spatial labeling inversion pulse cerebral MR angiography without subtraction by use of dual inversion recovery background suppression.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ishimori; Masahiko Monma; Hiraku Kawamura; Tomoko Miyata
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-12-01

6.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Thomas Bayer; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Torsten Sommer; Romhild Hoogeveen; Kai Wilhelm; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI.

Authors:  Siegfried Trattnig; Kathia Pinker; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Iris-Melanie Nöbauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Eye imaging with a 3.0-T MRI using a surface coil--a study on volunteers and initial patients with uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Arne-Jörn Lemke; Minouche Alai-Omid; Susanne Anja Hengst; Iris Kazi; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J van Amerongen; H D Boogaarts; J de Vries; A L M Verbeek; F J A Meijer; M Prokop; R H M A Bartels
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.