Literature DB >> 14657322

Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience.

Winfried A Willinek1, Markus Born, Birgit Simon, Henriette J Tschampa, Carsten Krautmacher, Jurgen Gieseke, Horst Urbach, Hans J Textor, Hans H Schild.   

Abstract

Intracranial three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was performed in seven healthy volunteers and eight patients with both 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR systems with standard and high spatial resolutions (true voxel sizes, 0.48 x 0.75 x 2.00 mm and 0.30 x 0.44 x 1.00 mm, respectively). Superior image quality and significantly better depiction of small vessel segments and vascular disease were observed at high-spatial-resolution 3.0-T TOF MR angiography but not at standard 1.5-T or standard 3.0-T TOF MR angiography (P <.01, respectively). Intracranial high-spatial-resolution TOF MR angiography at 3.0-T imaging provides diagnostic improvement in studies of cerebrovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14657322     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2293020782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  M Garcia; R Naraghi; T Zumbrunn; J Rösch; P Hastreiter; A Dörfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Will Brindle; Ana M Casado; Kirsten Shuler; Moira Henderson; Brenda Thomas; Jennifer Macfarlane; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Katherine Lymer; Zoe Morris; Cyril Pernet; William Nailon; Trevor Ahearn; Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni; Carlos Mugruza; John McLean; Goultchira Chakirova; Yuehui Terry Tao; Johanna Simpson; Andrew C Stanfield; Harriet Johnston; Jehill Parikh; Natalie A Royle; Janet De Wilde; Mark E Bastin; Nick Weir; Andrew Farrall; Maria C Valdes Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Customization of normal data base specific for 3-tesla MRI is mandatory in VSRAD analysis.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Yuuichi Suzuki; Osamu Abe; Naoto Hayashi; Shigeki Aoki; Harushi Mori; Tomohiko Masumoto; Yasushi Watanabe; Yoshirou Satake; Kenji Ino; Keiichi Yano; Kyouhito Iida; Kazuo Mima; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-06-17

4.  MR imaging of the brachial plexus: comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulia Succio; Carlo Emanuele Neumaier; Giovanni Serafini; Matteo Ghidara; Massimo Calabrese; Carlo Martinoli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Thomas Bayer; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Torsten Sommer; Romhild Hoogeveen; Kai Wilhelm; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ozkan Ozsarlak; Johan W Van Goethem; Menno Maes; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-12-04       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  3.0-T high-field magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: preliminary experiences.

Authors:  N Morakkabati-Spitz; J Gieseke; C Kuhl; G Lutterbey; M von Falkenhausen; F Traeber; O Zivanovic; H H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intra-individual comparison of image contrast in SPIO-enhanced liver MRI at 1.5T and 3.0T.

Authors:  Marcus von Falkenhausen; Carsten Meyer; Götz Lutterbey; Nuschin Morakkabati; Oliver Walter; Jürgen Gieseke; Renate Blömer; Winfried A Willinek; Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Image-guided radio-frequency gain calibration for high-field MRI.

Authors:  Elodie Breton; Kellyanne McGorty; Graham C Wiggins; Leon Axel; Daniel Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.