Literature DB >> 19449013

Carotid MR angiography with traditional bolus timing: clinical observations and Fourier-based modelling of contrast kinetics.

Jan Menke1.   

Abstract

This study analyses the relation between image quality and contrast kinetics in bolus-timed carotid magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and interprets the findings by Fourier-based numerical modelling. One hundred patients prone to carotid stenosis were studied using contrast-enhanced carotid MRA with bolus timing. The carotid MRAs were timed to start relatively early without accounting for the injection time of the contrast medium. For interpretation different starting times were modelled, utilising the spectral information of the test bolus series. In the test bolus series the arterial time-to-peak showed a large 95% confidence interval of 12-27 s, indicating the need for individual MRA timing. All bolus-timed MRAs were of good diagnostic quality. The mean (+/-SD) arterial contrast-to-noise ratio was 53.0 (+/-12.8) and thus high, and 95% of the MRAs showed a slight venous contamination of 11.8% or less (median 5.6%). According to the Fourier-based modelling the central k-space may be acquired about 2 s before the arterial contrast peak. This results in carotid MRAs with sufficiently high arterial enhancement and little venous contamination. In conclusion, in bolus-timed carotid MRA a relatively short timing provides good arterial contrast with little venous contamination, which can be explained by Fourier-based numerical modelling of the contrast kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19449013      PMCID: PMC2762047          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1448-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  High spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries using the quadrature body coil at 3.0T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Winfried A Willinek; Thomas Bayer; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Torsten Sommer; Romhild Hoogeveen; Kai Wilhelm; Horst Urbach; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; F M Chappell; J J K Best; K Wartolowska; E Berry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Assessment of the abdominal aorta and its visceral branches by contrast-enhanced dynamic volumetric hepatic parallel magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility, reliability and accuracy.

Authors:  Robert Werder; Daniel Nanz; Amelie M Lutz; Dominik Weishaupt; Lucas McCormack; Burkhardt Seifert; Borut Marincek; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Highlights of the guidelines for screening of extracranial carotid artery disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Andrei V Alexandrov; Charles H Tegeler; Robert W Hobson; J Dennis Baker; L Nelson Hopkins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group.

Authors:  Larry B Goldstein; Robert Adams; Mark J Alberts; Lawrence J Appel; Lawrence M Brass; Cheryl D Bushnell; Antonio Culebras; Thomas J DeGraba; Philip B Gorelick; John R Guyton; Robert G Hart; George Howard; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; J V Ian Nixon; Ralph L Sacco
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank.

Authors:  A J Grau; C Weimar; F Buggle; A Heinrich; M Goertler; S Neumaier; J Glahn; T Brandt; W Hacke; H C Diener
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements.

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Hideya Yamamoto; Nobuhiko Hirai; Farzana Alam; Hideaki Kakizawa; Masashi Hieda; Toshihiro Tachikake; Kazushi Marukawa; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Honglei Zhang; Jeffrey H Maki; Martin R Prince
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.

Authors:  Ralph L Sacco; Robert Adams; Greg Albers; Mark J Alberts; Oscar Benavente; Karen Furie; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Gorelick; Jonathan Halperin; Robert Harbaugh; S Claiborne Johnston; Irene Katzan; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Edgar J Kenton; Michael Marks; Lee H Schwamm; Thomas Tomsick
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah M Debrey; Hua Yu; John K Lynch; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Violet L Wright; Sok-Ja D Janket; Alison E Baird
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  4 in total

1.  Noninvasive photoacoustic measurement of the composite indicator dilution curve for cardiac output estimation.

Authors:  DongYel Kang; Qiaojian Huang; Youzhi Li
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Imaging of the extracranial internal carotid artery in acute ischemic stroke: assessment of stenosis, plaques, and image quality using relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT).

Authors:  Ulrike Cornelia Isabel Hoyer; Simon Lennartz; Nuran Abdullayev; Florian Fichter; Stephanie T Jünger; Lukas Goertz; Kai Roman Laukamp; Roman Johannes Gertz; Jan-Peter Grunz; Christopher Hohmann; David Maintz; Thorsten Persigehl; Christoph Kabbasch; Jan Borggrefe; Kilian Weiss; Lenhard Pennig
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

3.  Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T.

Authors:  Ivan Platzek; Dominik Sieron; Philipp Wiggermann; Michael Laniado
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-23

4.  Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography Without Contrast and Triggering (REACT) for Fast Imaging of Extracranial Arteries in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 3 T.

Authors:  Lenhard Pennig; Christoph Kabbasch; Ulrike Cornelia Isabel Hoyer; Simon Lennartz; David Zopfs; Lukas Goertz; Kai Roman Laukamp; Anton Wagner; Jan-Peter Grunz; Jonas Doerner; Thorsten Persigehl; Kilian Weiss; Jan Borggrefe
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.649

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.