Literature DB >> 16892998

The failure to detect tactile change: a tactile analogue of visual change blindness.

Alberto Gallace1, Hong Z Tan, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

A large body of empirical research now shows that people are surprisingly poor at detecting significant changes in visually presented scenes. This phenomenon is known as change blindness in vision. A similar phenomenon occurs in audition, but to date no such effect has been documented in touch. In the present study, we explored the ability of people to detect changes introduced between two consecutively presented vibrotactile patterns presented over the body surface. The patterns consisted of two or three vibrotactile stimuli presented for 200 msec. The position of one of the vibrotactile stimuli composing the display was repeatedly changed (alternating between two different positions) on 50% of the trials, but the same pattern was presented repeatedly on the remaining trials. Three conditions were investigated: No interval between the patterns, an empty interval between the patterns, and a masked interval between the patterns. Change detection was near perfect in the no-interval block. Performance deteriorated somewhat in the empty-interval block, but by far the worst change detection performance occurred in the masked-interval block. These results demonstrate that "change blindness" can also affect tactile perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16892998     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment.

Authors:  J Downar; A P Crawley; D J Mikulis; K D Davis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Change-blindness as a result of 'mudsplashes'.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; R A Rensink; J J Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  The discrimination of dot patterns as a function of number and average separation of dots.

Authors:  R S FRENCH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-07

Review 5.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Numerosity judgments for tactile stimuli distributed over the body surface.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Hong Z Tan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Attention and the crossmodal construction of space.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Verification of the change blindness phenomenon while managing critical events on a combat information display.

Authors:  Joseph DiVita; Richard Obermayer; William Nugent; James M Linville
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.

Authors:  Chanon M Jones; Rob Gray; Charles Spence; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial attention modulates tactile change detection.

Authors:  Lore Van Hulle; Stefaan Van Damme; Charles Spence; Geert Crombez; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia).

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Tactile temporal offset cues reduce visual representational momentum.

Authors:  Simon Merz; Christian Frings; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A critical experimental study of the classical tactile threshold theory.

Authors:  Claudio A Perez; José R Donoso; Leonel E Medina
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Out of touch? Visual load induces inattentional numbness.

Authors:  Sandra Murphy; Polly Dalton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Simone Spagnol; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnthorsson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.