Literature DB >> 15668100

Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Nilli Lavie1.   

Abstract

The ability to remain focused on goal-relevant stimuli in the presence of potentially interfering distractors is crucial for any coherent cognitive function. However, simply instructing people to ignore goal-irrelevant stimuli is not sufficient for preventing their processing. Recent research reveals that distractor processing depends critically on the level and type of load involved in the processing of goal-relevant information. Whereas high perceptual load can eliminate distractor processing, high load on "frontal" cognitive control processes increases distractor processing. These findings provide a resolution to the long-standing early and late selection debate within a load theory of attention that accommodates behavioural and neuroimaging data within a framework that integrates attention research with executive function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668100     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  418 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The contribution of working memory to divided attention.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Linear increases in BOLD response associated with increasing proportion of incongruent trials across time in a colour Stroop task.

Authors:  Rachel L C Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Voluntary task switching under load: contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  Jelle Demanet; Frederick Verbruggen; Baptist Liefooghe; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

6.  Saccades elicit obligatory allocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Na Shao; Jie Li; Rende Shui; Xiaojie Zheng; Jiangang Lu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

7.  The neural fate of task-irrelevant features in object-based processing.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Rare targets are less susceptible to attention capture once detection has begun.

Authors:  Nicholas Hon; Gavin Ng; Gerald Chan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

9.  Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Naomi Vanlessen; Valentina Rossi; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.