Literature DB >> 21244924

Attention and the crossmodal construction of space.

J Driver1, C Spence.   

Abstract

Traditional studies of spatial attention consider only a single sensory modality at a time (e.g. just vision, or just audition). In daily life, however, our spatial attention often has to be coordinated across several modalities. This is a non-trivial problem, given that each modality initially codes space in entirely different ways. In the last five years, there has been a spate of studies on crossmodal attention. These have demonstrated numerous crossmodal links in spatial attention, such that attending to a particular location in one modality tends to produce corresponding shifts of attention in other modalities. The spatial coordinates of these crossmodal links illustrate that the internal representation of external space depends on extensive crossmodal integration. Recent neuroscience studies are discussed that suggest possible brain mechanisms for the crossmodal links in spatial attention.
Copyright © 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Year:  1998        PMID: 21244924     DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01188-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  69 in total

1.  Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.

Authors:  E Macaluso; M Eimer; C D Frith; J Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Measuring the sensitivity of tactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind participants using the adaptive psi method.

Authors:  Camille Vanderclausen; Lieve Filbrich; Anne De Volder; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  What a car does to your perception: Distance evaluations differ from within and outside of a car.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Hartmut Zoppke; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

5.  Examining the crossmodal consequences of viewing the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion.

Authors:  P J Cordo; V S Gurfinkel; S Brumagne; C Flores-Vieira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The failure to detect tactile change: a tactile analogue of visual change blindness.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Hong Z Tan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

8.  Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Switching auditory attention using spatial and non-spatial features recruits different cortical networks.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.