Literature DB >> 18224305

Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.

Chanon M Jones1, Rob Gray, Charles Spence, Hong Z Tan.   

Abstract

We investigated the tactile cuing of visual spatial attention using spatially-informative (75% valid) and spatially-noninformative (25% valid) tactile cues. The participants performed a visual change detection task following the presentation of a tactile spatial cue on their back whose location corresponded to one of the four visual quadrants on a computer monitor. The participants were explicitly instructed to use the spatially-informative tactile cues but to ignore the spatially-noninformative cues. In addition to reaction time data, participants' eye-gaze was monitored as a measure of overt visual attention. The results showed that the spatially-informative tactile cues resulted in initial saccades toward the cued visual quadrants, and significantly reduced the visual change detection latencies. When spatially-noninformative tactile cues were used, the participants were largely successful at ignoring them as indicated by a saccade distribution that was independent of the quadrant that was cued, as well as the lack of a significant change in search time as compared to the baseline measure of no tactile cuing. The eye-gaze data revealed that the participants could not always completely ignore the spatially-noninformative tactile cues. Our results suggest that the tactile cuing of visual attention is natural but not automatic when the tactile cue and visual target are not collocated spatially, and that it takes effort to ignore the cues even when they are known to provide no useful information. In addition, our results confirm previous findings that spatially-informative tactile cues are especially effective at directing overt visual attention to locations that are not typically monitored visually, such as the bottom of a computer screen or the rearview mirror in an automobile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18224305     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1277-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  C Spence; F Pavani; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs.

Authors:  S Kennett; M Eimer; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting.

Authors:  L M Ward; J J McDonald; D Lin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

4.  Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture.

Authors:  Steffan Kennett; Charles Spence; Jon Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

5.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Hong Z Tan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Directed attention eliminates 'change deafness' in complex auditory scenes.

Authors:  Ranmalee Eramudugolla; Dexter R F Irvine; Ken I McAnally; Russell L Martin; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: a unitary mechanism?

Authors:  G Tassinari; D Campara
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Enhanced tactile performance at the destination of an upcoming saccade.

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Kristen Greene; Gregory Sasine; Gordon Baylis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.

Authors:  Monica N Lees; Joshua Cosman; John D Lee; Shaun P Vecera; Jeffrey D Dawson; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  A "virtually minimal" visuo-haptic training of attention in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Assaf Y Dvorkin; Milan Ramaiya; Eric B Larson; Felise S Zollman; Nancy Hsu; Sonia Pacini; Amit Shah; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.