Literature DB >> 23109085

Spatial attention modulates tactile change detection.

Lore Van Hulle1, Stefaan Van Damme, Charles Spence, Geert Crombez, Alberto Gallace.   

Abstract

People often fail to detect changes between successively presented tactile patterns, a phenomenon known as tactile change blindness. In this study, we investigated whether changes introduced to tactile patterns are detected better when a participant's attention is focused on the location where the change occurs. Across two experiments, participants (N = 55) were instructed to detect changes between two consecutively presented tactile patterns. In half of the trials, the stimulated body sites in the two patterns were identical. In the other half of the trials, one of the stimulated body locations differed between the two patterns. Endogenous (or voluntary) attention was manipulated by instructing participants which new bodily location was most likely to be stimulated. We found that changes at the attended location were detected more accurately than changes at bodily locations that were unattended. This finding demonstrates that attention can effectively modulate tactile change detection. We discuss the value of this experimental paradigm for investigating excessive attentional focus or hypervigilance to particular regions of the body in various clinical populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109085     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3311-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment.

Authors:  J Downar; A P Crawley; D J Mikulis; K D Davis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The clothing effect: tactile neurons in the precentral gyrus do not respond to the touch of the familiar primate chair.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Shalani E Alisharan; Xintian Hu; Charles G Gross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Hypervigilance to pain: an experimental and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Geert Crombez; Stefaan Van Damme; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach.

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Lies Notebaert
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-12

Review 5.  Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical 'body matrix'.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  What you see is what you need.

Authors:  Jochen Triesch; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Illusory touch and tactile perception in somatoform dissociators.

Authors:  Richard J Brown; Natalie Brunt; Ellen Poliakoff; Donna M Lloyd
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Neglect-like tactile dysfunction in chronic back pain.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Laura Gallagher; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Attentional functioning in fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain patients.

Authors:  Bruce Dick; Chris Eccleston; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-12-15

10.  Interoceptive and exteroceptive attention have opposite effects on subsequent somatosensory perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Laura Mirams; Ellen Poliakoff; Richard J Brown; Donna M Lloyd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  6 in total

1.  No Evidence for Threat-Induced Spatial Prioritization of Somatosensory Stimulation during Pain Control Using a Synchrony Judgment Paradigm.

Authors:  Wouter Durnez; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cross-modal cueing effects of visuospatial attention on conscious somatosensory perception.

Authors:  Deniz Doruk; Lorena Chanes; Alejandra Malavera; Lotfi B Merabet; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-04-30

3.  Impact of pressure as a tactile stimulus on working memory in healthy participants.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Dehghan Nayyeri; Markus Burgmer; Bettina Pfleiderer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visual short-term memory capacity predicts the "bandwidth" of visual long-term memory encoding.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

5.  Feeling stiffness in the back: a protective perceptual inference in chronic back pain.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; G Lorimer Moseley; Arnold Y L Wong; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Balance in Blind Subjects: Cane and Fingertip Touch Induce Similar Extent and Promptness of Stance Stabilization.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Francesco Decortes; Monica Schmid; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.