Literature DB >> 12760619

Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices.

Michael S Vitevitch1.   

Abstract

A shadowing task was used to demonstrate an auditory analogue of change blindness (the failure to detect a change in a visual scene), namely change deafness. Participants repeated words varying in lexical difficulty. Halfway through the word list, either the same or a different talker presented the words to participants. At least 40% of the participants failed to detect the change in talker. More interesting is that differences in shadowing times were found as a function of change detection. Alternative possibilities to the change detection phenomenon were ruled out. The results of these experiments suggest that the allocation of attention may influence the detection of changes as well as the processing of spoken words in complex ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760619      PMCID: PMC2553696          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change.

Authors:  Michael K McBeath; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  [The voice of twins. I. A study on voice identification by twins in 104 twin-pairs (58 MZ and 46 DZ)].

Authors:  L GEDDA; A BIANCHI; L BIANCHI-NERONI
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1955-05

3.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  C S Martin; J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; W V Summers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; D B Pisoni; J S Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 8.  Speaker recognition. An interpretive survey of the literature.

Authors:  M H Hecker
Journal:  ASHA Monogr       Date:  1971-01

9.  Childhood hearing impairment: auditory and linguistic interactions during multidimensional speech processing.

Authors:  S Jerger; R Martin; D A Pearson; T Dinh
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08

10.  Auditory stroop effects in children with hearing impairment.

Authors:  S Jerger; G Stout; M Kent; E Albritton; L Loiselle; R Blondeau; S Jorgenson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal; Jean-René Cazalets; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The failure to detect tactile change: a tactile analogue of visual change blindness.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Hong Z Tan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

3.  Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.

Authors:  Chanon M Jones; Rob Gray; Charles Spence; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inattentional deafness in music.

Authors:  Sabrina Koreimann; Bartosz Gula; Oliver Vitouch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-21

5.  Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Howard C Nusbaum; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; David Saltzman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Tactile suppression of displacement.

Authors:  Mounia Ziat; Vincent Hayward; C Elaine Chapman; Marc O Ernst; Charles Lenay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of memory on the speech-to-song illusion.

Authors:  Lauren E Soehlke; Ashwini Kamat; Nichol Castro; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-26

8.  Change deafness can be reduced, but not eliminated, using brief training interventions.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-06

9.  Processing of indexical information requires time: Evidence from change deafness.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Alexander Donoso
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.