OBJECTIVE: There is considerable ethical and legal ambiguity surrounding the role of adolescents in the decision-making process for research participation. Depending on the nature of the study and the regulations involved, adolescents may have independent responsibility for providing informed consent, they may be asked to provide their assent, or they may be completely excluded from the decision-making process. This study examined parent and adolescent perceptions of decision-making authority and sources of influence on adolescent research participation decisions, and examined whether perceptions of influence differed based on adolescent gender and level of research risk. STUDY DESIGN: Adolescents (n = 36) with asthma and their parents reviewed 9 pediatric research protocols, decided whether they would choose to participate, rated the extent they would be responsible for the actual decision, and indicated the ability of family and physician to influence their decisions. Multivariate analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in perceptions of decision-making authority and sources of influence on the decisions. RESULTS: Adolescents were less willing to cede decision making authority to parents than parents anticipated. Parents and adolescents acknowledged a greater openness to influence from physicians than from family for above minimal risk studies. Parents were more willing to consider opinions from male adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents desire responsibility for research participation decisions, though parents may not share these views. Physicians' views on research participation are important to families, especially for above minimal risk studies. Parents may grant more decision-making autonomy to adolescent males than to females. Researchers, physicians, and institutions play a key role in facilitating the ethical enrollment of adolescents into biomedical research. Educational, policy, and oversight processes that support both adolescent autonomy and parental responsibility for research participation decision-making in biomedical research are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: There is considerable ethical and legal ambiguity surrounding the role of adolescents in the decision-making process for research participation. Depending on the nature of the study and the regulations involved, adolescents may have independent responsibility for providing informed consent, they may be asked to provide their assent, or they may be completely excluded from the decision-making process. This study examined parent and adolescent perceptions of decision-making authority and sources of influence on adolescent research participation decisions, and examined whether perceptions of influence differed based on adolescent gender and level of research risk. STUDY DESIGN: Adolescents (n = 36) with asthma and their parents reviewed 9 pediatric research protocols, decided whether they would choose to participate, rated the extent they would be responsible for the actual decision, and indicated the ability of family and physician to influence their decisions. Multivariate analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in perceptions of decision-making authority and sources of influence on the decisions. RESULTS: Adolescents were less willing to cede decision making authority to parents than parents anticipated. Parents and adolescents acknowledged a greater openness to influence from physicians than from family for above minimal risk studies. Parents were more willing to consider opinions from male adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents desire responsibility for research participation decisions, though parents may not share these views. Physicians' views on research participation are important to families, especially for above minimal risk studies. Parents may grant more decision-making autonomy to adolescent males than to females. Researchers, physicians, and institutions play a key role in facilitating the ethical enrollment of adolescents into biomedical research. Educational, policy, and oversight processes that support both adolescent autonomy and parental responsibility for research participation decision-making in biomedical research are discussed.
Authors: John S Santelli; Audrey Smith Rogers; Walter D Rosenfeld; Robert H DuRant; Nancy Dubler; Madlyn Morreale; Abigail English; Sheryl Lyss; Yolanda Wimberly; Anna Schissel Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Mandy L Perryman; Keely M W Cofrin Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Christine Grady; Lori Wiener; Emily Abdoler; Emily Trauernicht; Sima Zadeh; Douglas S Diekema; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Jenny K R Francis; Lauren Dapena Fraiz; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2017-12-10 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Victoria A Miller; Justin N Baker; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Eric Kodish Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Renate D Savich; Beth B Tigges; Lisbeth Iglesias Rios; Joanne McCloskey; Kristine Tollestrup; Robert D Annett Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2019-11-28