BACKGROUND: There has been a recent growth in empirical research on assent with pediatric populations, due in part, to the demand for increased participation of this population in biomedical research. Despite methodological limitations, studies of adolescent capacities to assent have advanced and identified a number of salient psychological and social variables that are key to understanding assent. METHODS: The authors review a subsection of the empirical literature on adolescent assent focusing primarily on asthma and cancer therapeutic research; adolescent competencies to assent to these studies; perceptions of protocol risk and benefit; the affects of various social context variables on adolescent research participation decision making; and the inter-relatedness of these psychological and social factors. RESULTS: Contemporary studies of assent, using multivariate methods and updated approaches to statistical modeling, have revealed the importance of studying the intercorrelation between adolescents' psychological capacities and their ability to employ these capacities in family and medical decision-making contexts. Understanding these dynamic relationships will enable researchers and ethicists to develop assent procedures that respect the authority of parents, while at the same time accord adolescents appropriate decision-making autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Reviews of empirical literature on the assent process reveal that adolescents possess varying capacities for biomedical research participation decision making depending on their maturity and the social context in which the decision is made. The relationship between adolescents and physician-investigators can be used to attenuate concerns about research protocols and clarify risk and benefit information so adolescents, in concert with their families, can make the most informed and ethical decisions. Future assent researchers will be better able to navigate the complicated interplay of contextual and developmental factors and develop the empirical bases for research enrollment protocols that will support increased involvement of adolescents in biomedical research.
BACKGROUND: There has been a recent growth in empirical research on assent with pediatric populations, due in part, to the demand for increased participation of this population in biomedical research. Despite methodological limitations, studies of adolescent capacities to assent have advanced and identified a number of salient psychological and social variables that are key to understanding assent. METHODS: The authors review a subsection of the empirical literature on adolescent assent focusing primarily on asthma and cancer therapeutic research; adolescent competencies to assent to these studies; perceptions of protocol risk and benefit; the affects of various social context variables on adolescent research participation decision making; and the inter-relatedness of these psychological and social factors. RESULTS: Contemporary studies of assent, using multivariate methods and updated approaches to statistical modeling, have revealed the importance of studying the intercorrelation between adolescents' psychological capacities and their ability to employ these capacities in family and medical decision-making contexts. Understanding these dynamic relationships will enable researchers and ethicists to develop assent procedures that respect the authority of parents, while at the same time accord adolescents appropriate decision-making autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Reviews of empirical literature on the assent process reveal that adolescents possess varying capacities for biomedical research participation decision making depending on their maturity and the social context in which the decision is made. The relationship between adolescents and physician-investigators can be used to attenuate concerns about research protocols and clarify risk and benefit information so adolescents, in concert with their families, can make the most informed and ethical decisions. Future assent researchers will be better able to navigate the complicated interplay of contextual and developmental factors and develop the empirical bases for research enrollment protocols that will support increased involvement of adolescents in biomedical research.
Entities:
Keywords:
Assent; Informed Consent; Pediatric Biomedical Research; Research Ethics; Research Participation Decision-making
Authors: Martine C de Vries; Jan M Wit; Dirk P Engberts; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Evert van Leeuwen Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: David G Scherer; Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; Jeanne Hetter; Laura Weiss Roberts; Keely M W Cofrin Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Gail Geller; Ellen S Tambor; Barbara A Bernhardt; Gertrude Fraser; Lawrence S Wissow Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: L E Arnold; D M Stoff; E Cook; D J Cohen; M Kruesi; C Wright; J Hattab; P Graham; A Zametkin; F X Castellanos Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Lori Wiener; Adrienne Viola; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler; Christine Grady Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Jenny K R Francis; Lauren Dapena Fraiz; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2017-12-10 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Jenny K R Francis; Ariel M de Roche; Christine Mauro; Sara E Landers; Jane Chang; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Susan L Rosenthal; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Lisa S Ipp; Jane Chang; Jenny K R Francis; Mei-Chen Hu Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Noor A A Giesbertz; Karen Melham; Jane Kaye; Johannes J M van Delden; Annelien L Bredenoord Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 2.652