Literature DB >> 15536422

Perception of risk associated with asthma research procedures among adolescents, parents, and pediatricians.

Robert D Annett1, Janet L Brody, David G Scherer, Elizabeth A Perkett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little empirical data exist about how adolescents with asthma, their parents, and pediatricians view the risks and benefits associated with asthma clinical research.
OBJECTIVE: Two studies examined similarities and differences in the perception of risks and benefits associated with asthma research.
METHODS: In study I questionnaires were completed by adolescents with asthma and parents at the end of an audio and written presentation of a hypothetical research vignette. In study II adolescents with asthma, their parents, and pediatricians rated the risks and benefits associated with discreet asthma research procedures.
RESULTS: In study I adolescents and parents made distinctions in riskiness among the asthma research procedures ( P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). With the exception of venipuncture, rank orders of risk ratings among procedures were similar for both groups. In study II significant differences in risk and benefit ratings for individual procedures were found among respondent groups, including experimental medication, placebo, and venipuncture. Overall, asthma research procedures were viewed as more beneficial than risky ( P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Participants generally viewed asthma research procedures as more beneficial than risky. Overall, the relative risk rankings among all respondents were similar. However, there were between-group difference in ratings of risk associated with venipuncture and experimental medication. Parents and adolescents rated the benefit of placebo significantly higher than did pediatricians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15536422     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  15 in total

Review 1.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Mandy L Perryman; Keely M W Cofrin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Robert D Annett; Charles Turner; Jeanne Dalen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Adolescent decision making about participation in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trial.

Authors:  Andreia B Alexander; Mary A Ott; Michelle A Lally; Kevin Sniecinski; Alyne Baker; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  It takes two to tango: ethical issues raised by the study of topical microbicides with adolescent dyads.

Authors:  Mary A Ott
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

7.  A randomized study of a method for optimizing adolescent assent to biomedical research.

Authors:  Robert D Annett; Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Charles W Turner; Jeanne Dalen; Hengameh Raissy
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 8.  A practical approach to risk-benefit estimation in pediatric drug research.

Authors:  Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

10.  Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Joshua G Rosenberger; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.