Literature DB >> 20569150

Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research.

Mary A Ott1, Joshua G Rosenberger, J Dennis Fortenberry.   

Abstract

An understanding of why parents provide consent for adolescent participation in research on sensitive topics can inform and improve the ethical conduct and review of such research. As part of a longitudinal study of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in lower-income adolescents, we asked 134 parents why they permitted their daughter to participate, analyzing responses using qualitative methods. Over half described participation benefits, providing reasons such as the study being generally good for their daughters, sex education, someone to talk to, and STI testing. Other reasons included positive interactions and familiarity with research and clinical staff, friend or family member participation, and adolescent autonomy in making the decision to participate. If parents perceived their daughter to be "at risk" in some way, such as for STI or pregnancy, they were more likely to cite participation benefits. These data can be used to make such research more sensitive to family and community needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20569150      PMCID: PMC3113634          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  24 in total

1.  Empirical research on research ethics.

Authors:  Joan E Sieber
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2004

2.  Perception of risk associated with asthma research procedures among adolescents, parents, and pediatricians.

Authors:  Robert D Annett; Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Elizabeth A Perkett
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Mandy L Perryman; Keely M W Cofrin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; David G Scherer; Robert D Annett; Charles Turner; Jeanne Dalen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Ethical issues in adolescent and parent informed consent for pediatric asthma research participation.

Authors:  David G Scherer; Robert D Annett; Janet L Brody
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.515

6.  The therapeutic misconception at 25: treatment, research, and confusion.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 7.  Research involving adolescents as subjects : ethical considerations.

Authors:  Robert J Levine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research.

Authors:  J E Sieber; B Stanley
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1988-01

9.  Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health.

Authors:  M D Resnick; P S Bearman; R W Blum; K E Bauman; K M Harris; J Jones; J Tabor; T Beuhring; R E Sieving; M Shew; M Ireland; L H Bearinger; J R Udry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Daily mood, partner support, sexual interest, and sexual activity among adolescent women.

Authors:  J Dennis Fortenberry; M'Hamed Temkit; Wanzhu Tu; Cynthia A Graham; Barry P Katz; Donald P Orr
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  9 in total

1.  Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

2.  Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?

Authors:  Kristin L Moilanen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-02-24

3.  Parents' Perspectives About Adolescent Boys' Involvement in Biomedical HIV Prevention Research.

Authors:  Brian Mustanski; Kathryn Macapagal; Matthew Thomann; Brian A Feinstein; Michael E Newcomb; Darnell Motley; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-09-05

4.  Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  The Significance of Benefit Perceptions for the Ethics of HIV Research Involving Adolescents in Kenya.

Authors:  Stuart Rennie; Allison K Groves; Denise Dion Hallfors; Bonita J Iritani; Fredrick S Odongo; Winnie K Luseno
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Adolescents and Their Parents Differ on Descriptions of a Reproductive Health Study.

Authors:  Jenny K R Francis; Lily F Hoffman; Mei-Chen Hu; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Obtaining waivers of parental consent: A strategy endorsed by gay, bisexual, and queer adolescent males for health prevention research.

Authors:  Dalmacio Flores; Ross McKinney; Joyell Arscott; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  Adolescent and Parent Willingness to Participate in Microbicide Safety Studies.

Authors:  Marina Catallozzi; Ariel M de Roche; Mei-Chen Hu; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jane Chang; Lisa S Ipp; Jenny K R Francis; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 1.814

9.  Parents' and teachers' views on sexual health education and screening for sexually transmitted infections among in-school adolescent girls in Kenya: a qualitative study.

Authors:  George Wanje; Linnet Masese; Ethel Avuvika; Anisa Baghazal; Grace Omoni; R Scott McClelland
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.